Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The reconstructed cranium of Pierolapithecus and the evolution of the great ape face.
Pugh, Kelsey D; Catalano, Santiago A; Pérez de Los Ríos, Miriam; Fortuny, Josep; Shearer, Brian M; Vecino Gazabón, Alessandra; Hammond, Ashley S; Moyà-Solà, Salvador; Alba, David M; Almécija, Sergio.
  • Pugh KD; Department of Anthropology, Brooklyn College, City University of New York, Brooklyn, NY 11210.
  • Catalano SA; Division of Anthropology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024.
  • Pérez de Los Ríos M; New York Consortium in Evolutionary Primatology, New York, NY 10024.
  • Fortuny J; Unidad Ejecutora Lillo, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas-Fundación Miguel Lillo, San Miguel de Tucumán 4000, Argentina.
  • Shearer BM; Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, San Miguel de Tucumán 4000, Argentina.
  • Vecino Gazabón A; Unidad de Antropología física, Departamento de Biodiversidad, Ecología y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid 28040, Spain.
  • Hammond AS; Institut Català de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona 08193, Spain.
  • Moyà-Solà S; New York Consortium in Evolutionary Primatology, New York, NY 10024.
  • Alba DM; Department of Cell Biology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016.
  • Almécija S; Department of Foundations of Medicine, New York University Long Island Grossman School of Medicine, Mineola, NY 11501.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 120(44): e2218778120, 2023 Oct 31.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37844214
Pierolapithecus catalaunicus (~12 million years ago, northeastern Spain) is key to understanding the mosaic nature of hominid (great ape and human) evolution. Notably, its skeleton indicates that an orthograde (upright) body plan preceded suspensory adaptations in hominid evolution. However, there is ongoing debate about this species, partly because the sole known cranium, preserving a nearly complete face, suffers from taphonomic damage. We 1) carried out a micro computerized tomography (CT) based virtual reconstruction of the Pierolapithecus cranium, 2) assessed its morphological affinities using a series of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) morphometric analyses, and 3) modeled the evolution of key aspects of ape face form. The reconstruction clarifies many aspects of the facial morphology of Pierolapithecus. Our results indicate that it is most similar to great apes (fossil and extant) in overall face shape and size and is morphologically distinct from other Middle Miocene apes. Crown great apes can be distinguished from other taxa in several facial metrics (e.g., low midfacial prognathism, relatively tall faces) and only some of these features are found in Pierolapithecus, which is most consistent with a stem (basal) hominid position. The inferred morphology at all ancestral nodes within the hominoid (ape and human) tree is closer to great apes than to hylobatids (gibbons and siamangs), which are convergent with other smaller anthropoids. Our analyses support a hominid ancestor that was distinct from all extant and fossil hominids in overall facial shape and shared many features with Pierolapithecus. This reconstructed ancestral morphotype represents a testable hypothesis that can be reevaluated as new fossils are discovered.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Hominidae / Hylobatidae Límite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Hominidae / Hylobatidae Límite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article