Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk model-based management for second primary lung cancer among lung cancer survivors through a validated risk prediction model.
Choi, Eunji; Luo, Sophia J; Ding, Victoria Y; Wu, Julie T; Kumar, Ashok V; Wampfler, Jason; Tammemägi, Martin C; Wilkens, Lynne R; Aredo, Jacqueline V; Backhus, Leah M; Neal, Joel W; Leung, Ann N; Freedman, Neal D; Hung, Rayjean J; Amos, Christopher I; Le Marchand, Loïc; Cheng, Iona; Wakelee, Heather A; Yang, Ping; Han, Summer S.
  • Choi E; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Luo SJ; Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Ding VY; Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Wu JT; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Kumar AV; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Wampfler J; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Tammemägi MC; Department of Quantitative Health Science, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
  • Wilkens LR; Department of Quantitative Health Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Aredo JV; Department of Health Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.
  • Backhus LM; Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
  • Neal JW; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Leung AN; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Freedman ND; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California, USA.
  • Hung RJ; Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Amos CI; Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Le Marchand L; Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
  • Cheng I; National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  • Wakelee HA; Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Yang P; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Han SS; Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
Cancer ; 130(5): 770-780, 2024 03 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37877788
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Recent therapeutic advances and screening technologies have improved survival among patients with lung cancer, who are now at high risk of developing second primary lung cancer (SPLC). Recently, an SPLC risk-prediction model (called SPLC-RAT) was developed and validated using data from population-based epidemiological cohorts and clinical trials, but real-world validation has been lacking. The predictive performance of SPLC-RAT was evaluated in a hospital-based cohort of lung cancer survivors.

METHODS:

The authors analyzed data from 8448 ever-smoking patients diagnosed with initial primary lung cancer (IPLC) in 1997-2006 at Mayo Clinic, with each patient followed for SPLC through 2018. The predictive performance of SPLC-RAT and further explored the potential of improving SPLC detection through risk model-based surveillance using SPLC-RAT versus existing clinical surveillance guidelines.

RESULTS:

Of 8448 IPLC patients, 483 (5.7%) developed SPLC over 26,470 person-years. The application of SPLC-RAT showed high discrimination area under the receiver operating characteristics curve 0.81). When the cohort was stratified by a 10-year risk threshold of ≥5.6% (i.e., 80th percentile from the SPLC-RAT development cohort), the observed SPLC incidence was significantly elevated in the high-risk versus low-risk subgroup (13.1% vs. 1.1%, p < 1 × 10-6 ). The risk-based surveillance through SPLC-RAT (≥5.6% threshold) outperformed the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines with higher sensitivity (86.4% vs. 79.4%) and specificity (38.9% vs. 30.4%) and required 20% fewer computed tomography follow-ups needed to detect one SPLC (162 vs. 202).

CONCLUSION:

In a large, hospital-based cohort, the authors validated the predictive performance of SPLC-RAT in identifying high-risk survivors of SPLC and showed its potential to improve SPLC detection through risk-based surveillance. PLAIN LANGUAGE

SUMMARY:

Lung cancer survivors have a high risk of developing second primary lung cancer (SPLC). However, no evidence-based guidelines for SPLC surveillance are available for lung cancer survivors. Recently, an SPLC risk-prediction model was developed and validated using data from population-based epidemiological cohorts and clinical trials, but real-world validation has been lacking. Using a large, real-world cohort of lung cancer survivors, we showed the high predictive accuracy and risk-stratification ability of the SPLC risk-prediction model. Furthermore, we demonstrated the potential to enhance efficiency in detecting SPLC using risk model-based surveillance strategies compared to the existing consensus-based clinical guidelines, including the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias / Supervivientes de Cáncer / Neoplasias Pulmonares Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias / Supervivientes de Cáncer / Neoplasias Pulmonares Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article