Inconsistent radiographic diagnostic criteria for lisfranc injuries: a systematic review.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord
; 24(1): 915, 2023 Nov 27.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38012651
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE:
To evaluate the radiographic diagnostic criteria and propose standardised radiographic criteria for Lisfranc injuries.METHODS:
A systematic review of the PubMed and Embase databases was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The various radiographic criteria for the diagnosis of Lisfranc injuries were extracted. Descriptive statistics were presented for all continuous (as mean ± standard deviation) and categorical variables (as frequencies by percentages).RESULTS:
The literature search included 29 studies that totalled 1115 Lisfranc injuries. The risk of bias ranged from "Low" to "Moderate" risk according to the ROBINS-I tool. The overall recommendations according to the GRADE assessment ranged from "Very Low" to "High". 1st metatarsal to 2nd metatarsal diastasis was the most common of the 12 various radiographic diagnostic criteria observed, as was employed in 18 studies. This was followed by 2nd cuneiform to 2nd metatarsal subluxation, as was employed in 11 studies.CONCLUSION:
The radiographic diagnostic criteria of Lisfranc injuries were heterogeneous. The proposition for homogenous radiographic diagnostic criteria is that the following features must be observed for the diagnosis of Lisfranc injuries 1st metatarsal to 2nd metatarsal diastasis of ≥ 2 mm on anteroposterior view or 2nd cuneiform to 2nd metatarsal subluxation on anteroposterior or oblique views. Further advanced imaging by CT or MRI may be required in patients with normal radiographs but with continued suspicion for Lisfranc injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4, systematic review.Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Banco de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Huesos Metatarsianos
/
Traumatismos de los Pies
/
Luxaciones Articulares
Tipo de estudio:
Systematic_reviews
Límite:
Humans
Idioma:
En
Año:
2023
Tipo del documento:
Article