Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The application of Foley catheter traction technique in extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Jiang, Xiao-Lu; OuYang, Kui; Yang, Rui; Sun, Jia-Ning; Zhang, Feng; Zhao, Hong-Wei.
  • Jiang XL; Medical College of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
  • OuYang K; Medical College of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
  • Yang R; Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, School of Clinical Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China.
  • Sun JN; Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, School of Clinical Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China.
  • Zhang F; Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, School of Clinical Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China.
  • Zhao HW; Department of Urology, Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, NO. 20 East Yuhuangding Road, Yantai, Shandong, 264000, China. 15153578806@126.com.
BMC Urol ; 23(1): 201, 2023 Dec 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38053112
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To describe a technique to improve exposure of prostate during extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (EP-RARP). MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

From March 2020 to June 2022, a total of 41 patients with prior intra-abdominal surgery underwent EP-RARP. Twenty-three patients improved exposure by traction of prostate through urinary catheter. The catheter traction prostatectomy (CTP) group was compared with the standard prostatectomy (SP) group using three robotic arms (18 patients) in terms of estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, positive surgical margin rate, the recovery rate of urinary continence, Gleason score and postoperative hospital stays. Differences were considered significant when P < 0.05.

RESULTS:

The operative time was lower in the CTP group (109.63 min vs. 143.20 min; P < 0.001). EBL in the CTP group was 178.26 ± 30.70 mL, and in the standard prostatectomy group, it was 347.78 ± 53.53 mL (P < 0.001). No significant differences with regard to postoperative hospital stay, recovery rate of urinary continence, catheterization time and positive surgical margin were observed between both groups. No intraoperative complications occurred in all the patients. After 6 months of follow-up, the Post-op Detectable prostate specific antigen was similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION:

CTP is a feasible, safe, and valid procedure in EP-RARP. Application of CTP improved the exposure of prostate, reduced operative time and blood loss in comparison with the conventional procedure.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Robótica / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Robótica / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados Límite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article