Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Stroma AReactive Invasion Front Areas (SARIFA) improves prognostic risk stratification of perioperative chemotherapy treated oesophagogastric cancer patients from the MAGIC and the ST03 trial.
Grosser, Bianca; Emmerson, Jake; Reitsam, Nic G; Cunningham, David; Nankivell, Matthew; Langley, Ruth E; Allum, William H; Trepel, Martin; Märkl, Bruno; Grabsch, Heike I.
  • Grosser B; Pathology, Medical Faculty Augsburg, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
  • Emmerson J; Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Reitsam NG; Pathology, Medical Faculty Augsburg, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
  • Cunningham D; Department of Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, Surrey, UK.
  • Nankivell M; Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK.
  • Langley RE; Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, UK.
  • Allum WH; Department of Oncology and Department of Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • Trepel M; Haematology and Oncology, Medical Faculty Augsburg, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
  • Märkl B; Pathology, Medical Faculty Augsburg, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany. bruno.maerkl@uka-science.de.
  • Grabsch HI; Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands. h.grabsch@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Br J Cancer ; 130(3): 457-466, 2024 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38123705
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Tumour-associated fat cells without desmoplastic stroma reaction at the invasion front (Stroma AReactive Invasion Front Areas (SARIFA)) is a prognostic biomarker in gastric and colon cancer. The clinical utility of the SARIFA status in oesophagogastric cancer patients treated with perioperative chemotherapy is currently unknown.

METHODS:

The SARIFA status was determined in tissue sections from patients recruited into the MAGIC (n = 292) or ST03 (n = 693) trials treated with surgery alone (S, MAGIC) or perioperative chemotherapy (MAGIC, ST03). The relationship between SARIFA status, clinicopathological factors, overall survival (OS) and treatment was analysed.

RESULTS:

The SARIFA status was positive in 42% MAGIC trial S patients, 28% MAGIC and 48% ST03 patients after pre-operative chemotherapy. SARIFA status was related to OS in MAGIC trial S patients and was an independent prognostic biomarker in ST03 trial patients (HR 1.974, 95% CI 1.555-2.507, p < 0.001). ST03 patients with lymph node metastasis (ypN + ) and SARIFA-positive tumours had poorer OS than patients with ypN+ and SARIFA-negative tumours (plogrank < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

The SARIFA status has clinical utility as prognostic biomarker in oesophagogastric cancer patients irrespective of treatment modality. Whilst underlying biological mechanisms warrant further investigation, the SARIFA status might be used to identify new drug targets, potentially enabling repurposing of existing drugs targeting lipid metabolism.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Adenocarcinoma Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Adenocarcinoma Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article