Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimization of Thromboprophylaxis Use in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients Through Implementation of a Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment Tool.
Sanchez, Airka; Campanella, Lauren; Perez, Kimberly.
  • Sanchez A; Department of Pharmacy (AS, LC, KP), St. Joseph's Children's Hospital, Tampa, FL.
  • Campanella L; Department of Pharmacy (AS, LC, KP), St. Joseph's Children's Hospital, Tampa, FL.
  • Perez K; Department of Pharmacy (AS, LC, KP), St. Joseph's Children's Hospital, Tampa, FL.
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther ; 28(5): 452-456, 2023.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38130498
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of hospital-acquired morbidity for pediatric patients. Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis increases the risk of adverse events such as bleeding complications. There exists a need for a universal VTE risk assessment tool to aid in thromboprophylaxis prescribing while minimizing the risk of adverse events. The objective of this study is to investigate if implementation of a VTE risk assessment tool is associated with a change in the rate of thromboprophylaxis prescribing.

METHODS:

This retrospective study evaluated the change in thromboprophylaxis prescribing pre and post implementation of a VTE risk assessment tool. Patients were excluded if they were pregnant, diagnosed with VTE ≤48 hours of admission, presented with VTE symptoms, or if they were diagnosed with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) or coronavirus disease (COVID-19).

RESULTS:

A total of 186 pediatric patients were included in this study. Thromboprophylaxis was prescribed in 16/93 (17.12%) and 75/93 (80.6%) patients in the pre- and post-implementation group, respectively (95% CI, 0.523-0.745; p < 0.001). No VTE events occurred in either group. Bleeding complications occurred in 3.2% and 7.5% of patients in the pre- and post-implementation groups, respectively. The risk tool was used in 80.6% of patients; providers used the tool correctly in 48% of patients and incorrectly in 52% of patients.

CONCLUSION:

Implementation of a VTE risk assessment tool was associated with a statistically significant change in the rate of thromboprophylaxis prescribing. Incorrect use may be minimized by providing provider reeducation and making modifications to the order set.
Palabras clave