Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mixed methods evaluation of the Caring for Providers to Improve Patient Experience intervention.
Afulani, Patience A; Getahun, Monica; Okiring, Jaffer; Ogolla, Beryl A; Oboke, Edwina N; Kinyua, Joyceline; Oluoch, Iscar; Odiase, Osamuedeme; Ochiel, Dan; Mendes, Wendy Berry; Ongeri, Linnet.
  • Afulani PA; Epidemiology and Biostatistics Department, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Getahun M; Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Okiring J; Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Ogolla BA; Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.
  • Oboke EN; Global Programs for Research and Training, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Kinyua J; Global Programs for Research and Training, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Oluoch I; Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Odiase O; County Executive Committee, Migori, Kenya.
  • Ochiel D; Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • Mendes WB; County Health Directorate, Migori, Kenya.
  • Ongeri L; Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 165(2): 487-506, 2024 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38146777
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the impact of the Caring for Providers to Improve Patient Experience (CPIPE) intervention, which sought to improve person-centered maternal care (PCMC) by addressing two key drivers provider stress and bias.

METHODS:

CPIPE was successfully piloted over 6 months in two health facilities in Migori County, Kenya, in 2022. The evaluation employed a mixed-methods pretest-posttest nonequivalent control group design. Data are from surveys with 80 providers (40 intervention, 40 control) at baseline and endline and in-depth interviews with 20 intervention providers. We conducted bivariate, multivariate, and difference-in-difference analysis of quantitative data and thematic analysis of qualitative data.

RESULTS:

In the intervention group, average knowledge scores increased from 7.8 (SD = 2.4) at baseline to 9.5 (standard deviation [SD] = 1.8) at endline for stress (P = 0.001) and from 8.9 (SD = 1.9) to 10.7 (SD = 1.7) for bias (P = 0.001). In addition, perceived stress scores decreased from 20.9 (SD = 3.9) to 18.6 (SD = 5.3) (P = 0.019) and burnout from 3.6 (SD = 1.0) to 3.0 (SD = 1.0) (P = 0.001), with no significant change in the control group. Qualitative data indicated that CPIPE had an impact at multiple levels. At the individual level, it improved provider knowledge, skills, self-efficacy, attitudes, behaviors, and experiences. At the interpersonal level, it improved provider-provider and patient-provider relationships, leading to a supportive work environment and improved PCMC. At the institutional level, it created a system of accountability for providing PCMC and nondiscriminatory care, and collective action and advocacy to address sources of stress.

CONCLUSION:

CPIPE impacted multiple outcomes in the theory of change, leading to improvements in both provider and patient experience, including for the most vulnerable patients. These findings will contribute to global efforts to prevent burnout and promote PCMC and equity.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Servicios de Salud Materna Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Servicios de Salud Materna Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article