Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accuracy of skeletal scintigraphy for the evaluation of mandibular growth disorders: a systematic review.
Boos-Lima, F B D J; Guastaldi, F P S; Kaban, L B; Peacock, Z S.
  • Boos-Lima FBDJ; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Guastaldi FPS; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Kaban LB; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Peacock ZS; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: zpeacock@partners.org.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 53(6): 482-495, 2024 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38158243
ABSTRACT
Bone scans, reflecting blood flow and metabolic activity in a region of interest, are frequently used to evaluate mandibular growth disorders. Increased uptake is a non-specific finding and can occur as a result of multiple causes. The correlation between radioactive tracer uptake and growth activity has not been consistently demonstrated. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of planar skeletal scintigraphy (SS), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and SPECT with computed tomography (CT) images (SPECT/CT) in detecting abnormal mandibular growth activity compared to clinical and radiographic/tomographic methods (reference standard) and histologic findings. A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for planar SS, SPECT, and SPECT/CT. Compared to the reference standard, SPECT/CT had the best diagnostic accuracy (76.5% sensitivity, 90.4% specificity, 83.2% accuracy), followed by planar SS (81.8% sensitivity, 84.5% specificity, 83.0% accuracy) and SPECT (77.7% sensitivity, 72.4% specificity, 74.5% accuracy). The results of this study indicate that SPECT/CT has the best clinical correlation, but the certainty of the evidence is low. The differences in sensitivity and specificity between the three index tests were not clinically significant. The three tests can be useful, with only a small difference in their diagnostic value. Histopathology was found not to be satisfactory as a reference standard.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cintigrafía / Tomografía Computarizada de Emisión de Fotón Único / Sensibilidad y Especificidad / Mandíbula Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cintigrafía / Tomografía Computarizada de Emisión de Fotón Único / Sensibilidad y Especificidad / Mandíbula Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article