Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient-specific automated cerebrospinal fluid pressure control to augment spinal wound closure: a case series using the LiquoGuard®.
Khan, Danyal Z; Tariq, Kanza; Lee, Keng Siang; Dyson, Edward W; Russo, Vittorio; Watkins, Laurence D; Russo, Antonino.
  • Khan DZ; Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
  • Tariq K; Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
  • Lee KS; Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
  • Dyson EW; Department of Brain Repair & Rehabilitation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
  • Russo V; Bristol Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
  • Watkins LD; Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
  • Russo A; Department of Brain Repair & Rehabilitation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Br J Neurosurg ; : 1-9, 2024 Jan 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38174716
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Spinal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks are common, and their management is heterogeneous. For high-flow leaks, numerous studies advocate for primary dural repair and CSF diversion. The LiquoGuard7® allows automated and precise pressure and volume control, and calculation of patient-specific CSF production rate (prCSF), which is hypothesized to be increased in the context of durotomies and CSF leaks.

METHODS:

This single-centre illustrative case series included patients undergoing complex spinal surgery where 1) a high flow intra-operative and/or post-operative CSF leak was expected and 2) lumbar CSF drainage was performed using a LiquoGuard7®. CSF diversion was tailored to prCSF for each patient, combined with layered spinal wound closure.

RESULTS:

Three patients were included, with a variety of pathologies T7/T8 disc prolapse, T8-T9 meningioma, and T4-T5 metastatic spinal cord compression. The first two patients underwent CSF diversion to prevent post-op CSF leak, whilst the third required this in response to post-op CSF leak. CSF hyperproduction was evident in all cases (mean >/=140ml/hr). With patient-specific CSF diversion regimes, no cases required further intervention for CSF fistulae repair (including for pleural CSF effusion), wound breakdown or infection.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patient-specific cerebrospinal fluid drainage may be a useful tool in the management of high-flow intra-operative and post-operative CSF leaks during complex spinal surgery. These systems may reduce post-operative CSF leakage from the wound or into adjacent body cavities. Further larger studies are needed to evaluate the comparative benefits and cost-effectiveness of this approach.
Palabras clave