Differences in pulmonary nodular consolidation and pulmonary cavity among drug-sensitive, rifampicin-resistant and multi-drug resistant tuberculosis patients: the Guangzhou computerized tomography study.

ABSTRACT

Background: Pulmonary nodular consolidation (PN) and pulmonary cavity (PC) may represent the two most promising imaging signs in differentiating multidrug-resistant (MDR)-pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) from drug-sensitive (DS)-PTB. However, there have been concerns that literature described radiological feature differences between DS-PTB and MDR-PTB were confounded by that MDR-PTB cases tend to have a longer history. This study seeks to further clarify this point. Methods: All cases were from the Guangzhou Chest Hospital, Guangzhou, China. We retrieved data of consecutive new MDR cases [n=46, inclusive of rifampicin-resistant (RR) cases] treated during the period of July 2020 and December 2021, and according to the electronic case archiving system records, the main PTB-related symptoms/signs history was ≤3 months till the first computed tomography (CT) scan in Guangzhou Chest Hospital was taken. To pair the MDR-PTB cases with assumed equal disease history length, we additionally retrieved data of 46 cases of DS-PTB patients. Twenty-two of the DS patients and 30 of the MDR patients were from rural communities. The first CT in Guangzhou Chest Hospital was analysed in this study. When the CT was taken, most cases had anti-TB drug treatment for less than 2 weeks, and none had been treated for more than 3 weeks. Results: Apparent CT signs associated with chronicity were noted in 10 cases in the DS group (10/46) and 9 cases in the MDR group (10/46). Thus, the overall disease history would have been longer than the assumed <3 months. Still, the history length difference between DS patients and MDR patients in the current study might not be substantial. The lung volume involvement was 11.3%±8.3% for DS cases and 8.4%±6.6% for MDR cases (P=0.022). There was no statistical difference between DS cases and MDR cases both in PN prevalence and in PC prevalence. For positive cases, MDR cases had more PN number (mean of positive cases 2.63 vs. 2.28, P=0.38) and PC number (mean of positive cases 2.14 vs. 1.38, P=0.001) than DS cases. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis shows, PN ≥4 and PC ≥3 had a specificity of 86% (sensitivity 25%) and 93% (sensitivity 36%), respectively, in suggesting the patient being a MDR cases. Conclusions: A combination of PN and PC features allows statistical separation of DS and MDR cases.