Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Translated article] Experience in major complications with total trapezometacarpal prostheses.
Sánchez-Crespo, M R; Couceiro-Otero, J; Del Canto-Alvarez, F J; Ayala-Gutiérrez, H; Holgado-Fernández, M.
  • Sánchez-Crespo MR; Unidad de Mano y Muñeca, Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Cantabria, Spain; Departamento de Medicina y Cirugía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Cantabria, Spain. Electronic address: manuelruben.sanchez
  • Couceiro-Otero J; Unidad de Mano y Muñeca, Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Cantabria, Spain; Escuela de Fisioterapia Gimbernat Cantabria, Torrelavega, Cantabria, Spain.
  • Del Canto-Alvarez FJ; Unidad de Mano y Muñeca, Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Cantabria, Spain; Departamento de Medicina y Cirugía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Cantabria, Spain.
  • Ayala-Gutiérrez H; Unidad de Mano y Muñeca, Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Cantabria, Spain.
  • Holgado-Fernández M; Unidad de Mano y Muñeca, Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Cantabria, Spain.
Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol ; 68(3): T181-T189, 2024.
Article en En, Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38232935
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The treatment of rhizarthrosis using trapeziometacarpal prostheses (TMP) is increasing. Complications may lead to loss of the implant and result in salvage surgery. Our aim was to assess major complications with the use of some TMP models and their rescue. MATERIAL AND

METHOD:

Retrospective study on TMP implanted between 2006 and 2021. Models studied Arpe®, Elektra®, Ivory®, Maïa®, Isis® and Touch®. Demographic data were assessed, implant placement by radiographic study, technical data, complications, salvage surgeries and final survival.

RESULTS:

Review of 224 TMP, 45 Arpe® (95.5% survival, rate follow-up [R] 6-16 years), 5 Elektra® (80% survival, R 13-14), 14 Ivory® (92.8% survival, R 9-11), 7 Maïa® (100% survival, R 8-9), 115 Isis® (99.1% survival, R 1-8), 38 Touch® (100% survival, R 1-4). The medial angle of the dome with the proximal articular surface of the trapezium in the lateral plane, was Arpe® 8.85°, Elektra® not assessable, Ivory® 6.6°, Maïa® 14.4°, Isis® 3.8°, and Touch® 5.95°. The Isis® was placed 100% with scopic guidance presenting a significantly lower angle respect to the medial angle of the dome with the proximal articular surface of the trapezium. As main complications, we observed 3.5% of dislocations and 4% of mobilisations, with the Elektra® being responsible for 47% of these. Nineteen salvage surgeries were performed, with 3% of the implants being lost.

CONCLUSIONS:

Dislocation and mobilisation are the most observed complications, the Elektra® responsible for almost half of them. Correct placement and implant design appear to be crucial to avoid them in the short and long term.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies Idioma: En / Es Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Observational_studies Idioma: En / Es Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article