Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Motion-based Device Urinary Incontinence Treatment: A Longitudinal Analysis at 18 and 24 Months.
Weinstein, Milena M; Dunivan, Gena C; Guaderrama, Noelani M; Richter, Holly E.
  • Weinstein MM; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. mweinstein2@mgh.harvard.edu.
  • Dunivan GC; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Guaderrama NM; Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Irvine, CA, USA.
  • Richter HE; University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Int Urogynecol J ; 35(4): 803-810, 2024 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38252280
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND

HYPOTHESIS:

There are sparse data regarding the long-term efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) for the treatment of urinary incontinence (UI). The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of an 8-week PFMT program guided by a motion-based intravaginal device versus a standard home program over 24 months.

METHODS:

Between October 2020 and March 2021, a total of 363 women with stress or stress-predominant mixed UI were randomized and completed an 8-week PFMT program using a motion-based intravaginal device (intervention group) or a home program following written/video instructions (control group). Participants were not asked to continue training after the 8-week program. At 18 and 24 months' follow-up, the Urogenital Distress Inventory, short-form (UDI-6) and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) were collected. In the original trial, a total of 139 participants in each arm were needed to detect a 0.3 effect size (alpha = 0.05, power 0.8, one-tailed t test) in the difference in UDI-6 scores.

RESULTS:

A total of 231 participants returned 24-month data. Mean age at 24 months was 51.7 ± 14.5 years, and mean BMI was 31.8 ± 7.4 kg/m2. Mean change in UDI-6 scores from baseline to 24 months was greater in the intervention group than the control group (-21.1 ± 24.5 vs -14.8 ± 19.4, p = 0.04). Reported improvement using PGI-I was greater in the intervention group than in the control group at 24 months (35% vs 22%, p = 0.03, OR 1.95(95% CI 1.08, 3.57).

CONCLUSIONS:

Pelvic floor muscle training guided by a motion-based prescription intravaginal device yielded durable and significantly greater UI symptom improvement than a standard home program, even in the absence of continued therapy.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Incontinencia Urinaria / Diafragma Pélvico / Terapia por Ejercicio Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Incontinencia Urinaria / Diafragma Pélvico / Terapia por Ejercicio Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article