Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comparison of two learning approach inventories and their utility in predicting examination performance and study habits.
Thompson, Andrew R.
  • Thompson AR; Department of Medical Education, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States.
Adv Physiol Educ ; 48(2): 164-170, 2024 Jun 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38269405
ABSTRACT
The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire and the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students are two instruments commonly used to measure student learning approach. Although they are designed to measure similar constructs, it is unclear whether the metrics they provide differ in terms of their real-world classification of learning approach. The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of these two inventories in a study population from an undergraduate (baccalaureate) human anatomy course. The three central goals of this study are to compare the inventories in terms of 1) how students are classified, 2) the relationship between examination performance, time spent studying, and learning approach, and 3) instrument reliability. Results demonstrate that student classifications of corresponding scales of each inventory are significantly correlated, suggesting they measure similar constructs. Although the inventories had similar reliability, neither was consistently strong in predicting examination performance or study habits. Overall, these results suggest that the two inventories are comparable in terms of how they measure learning approach, but the lack of correspondence between learning approach scores and measurement outcomes questions their validity as tools that can be used universally in classrooms.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Although learning approach inventories have been used extensively in education research, there has been no direct comparison of how student classification differs between instruments or how classification influences the interpretation of how learning approach impacts student performance. This is especially relevant in light of recent research questioning the validity of the Study Process Questionnaire (LoGiudice AB, Norman GR, Manzoor S, Monteiro S. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 28 47-63, 2023; Johnson SN, Gallagher ED, Vagnozzi AM. PLoS One 16 e0250600, 2021).
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Evaluación Educacional / Aprendizaje Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Evaluación Educacional / Aprendizaje Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article