Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of Concomitant Facial Fracture in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients-Simplification and External Validation of a Prediction Model.
Lin, Jennifer An-Jou; Li, Pei-Hua; Liao, Chien-Hung; Hsieh, Chi-Hsun; Kuo, Yu-Chi; Hsu, Ting-An; Chu, Yu-Ying; Fu, Chih-Yuan.
  • Lin JA; From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.
  • Li PH; Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Liao CH; Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Hsieh CH; Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Kuo YC; Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Hsu TA; Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Chu YY; From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.
  • Fu CY; Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Ann Plast Surg ; 92(1S Suppl 1): S27-S32, 2024 Jan 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38285992
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Patients with traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) often experience concurrent facial bone fractures. In 2021, a prediction model with 10 variables was published and precisely predicted concomitant facial fractures in TBI patients. Herein, external validation and simplification of this model was performed.

METHODS:

Traumatic brain injury patients treated at a major referral trauma center were retrospectively reviewed for 1 year. The original prediction model (published in 2021), which was developed from a rural level II trauma center, was applied for external validation. A new and simplified model from our level I trauma center was developed and backwardly validated by rural level II trauma center data.

RESULTS:

In total, 313 TBI patients were enrolled; 101 (32.3%) had concomitant facial fractures. When the previous prediction model was applied to the validation cohort, it achieved acceptable discrimination, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.713 and good precision, with a Brier score of 0.083. A new and simplified model with 6 variables (age, tooth rupture, epistaxis, facial lesion, eye injury, and intracranial hemorrhage) was created with excellent discrimination (AUC = 0.836) and good precision (Brier score of 0.055). The backward validation of this new model also showed excellent discrimination in the cohort used to develop the original model (AUC = 0.875).

CONCLUSION:

The original model provides an acceptable and reproducible prediction of concomitant facial fractures among TBI patients. A simplified model with fewer variables and the same accuracy could be applied in the emergency department and at higher- and lower-level trauma centers.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fracturas Craneales / Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fracturas Craneales / Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article