Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The absolute δ18 O value for SLAP with respect to VSMOW reveals a much lower value than previously established.
Aerts-Bijma, Anita Th; van Buuren, Albert C; Paul, Dipayan; Meijer, Harro A J.
  • Aerts-Bijma AT; Centre for Isotope Research (CIO), Energy and Sustainability Research Institute Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • van Buuren AC; Centre for Isotope Research (CIO), Energy and Sustainability Research Institute Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Paul D; Centre for Isotope Research (CIO), Energy and Sustainability Research Institute Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Meijer HAJ; Centre for Isotope Research (CIO), Energy and Sustainability Research Institute Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom ; 38(6): e9678, 2024 Mar 30.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38356090
ABSTRACT
RATIONALE SLAP is one of the two calibration materials for the isotopic water scale. By consensus the established δ18 O value is -55.5‰, although several expert laboratories measure significantly more negative δ18 OSLAP values. The real δ18 OSLAP value as such does not influence the isotopic water scale; however, knowledge of the size of isotopic scale contraction in stable isotope measurements is vital for second-order isotopes. This study describes the quantification of δ18 OSLAP with respect to δ18 OVSMOW .

METHODS:

SLAP-like water was quantitatively mixed with highly 18 O-enriched water to mimic VSMOW. The 18 O concentration was determined using an electron ionization quadrupole mass spectrometer. The isotopic composition of the SLAP-like and VSMOW-like waters was measured using an optical spectrometer, alongside original VSMOW and SLAP.

RESULTS:

This study resulted in a much more negative δ18 O value for SLAP than expected. The averaged outcome of seven independent experiments is δ18 OSLAP  = -56.33 ± 0.03‰. There is a large discrepancy between the actual isotopic measurements of even the most carefully operating isotope laboratories and the true δ18 O value.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although this finding as such does not influence the use of the VSMOW-SLAP scale, it raises the intriguing question of what we actually measure with our instruments and why even a fully corrected measurement can be so far off. Our result has consequences for issues like the transfer of δ18 O from and to the VPDB scale, various fractionation factors, and Δ17 O. The absolute 18 O abundance for SLAP was calculated as (1887.98 ± 0.43) × 10-6 based on the absolute 18 O abundance of VSMOW and the presented δ18 OSLAP in this paper.

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article