Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prognostic value of Mandard score and nodal status for recurrence patterns and survival after multimodal treatment of oesophageal adenocarcinoma.
Henckens, Sofie P G; Liu, Dajia; Gisbertz, Suzanne S; Kalff, Marianne C; Anderegg, Maarten C J; Crull, David; Daams, Freek; van Dalsen, Annette D; Dekker, Jan Willem T; van Det, Marc J; van Duijvendijk, Peter; Eshuis, Wietse J; Groenendijk, Richard P R; Haveman, Jan Willem; van Hillegersberg, Richard; Luyer, Misha D P; Olthof, Pim B; Pierie, Jean-Pierre E N; Plat, Victor D; Rosman, Camiel; Ruurda, Jelle P; van Sandick, Johanna W; Sosef, Meindert N; Voeten, Daan M; Vijgen, Guy H E J; Bijlsma, Maarten F; Meijer, Sybren L; Hulshof, Maarten C C M; Oyarce, Cesar; Lagarde, Sjoerd M; van Laarhoven, Hanneke W M; van Berge Henegouwen, Mark I.
  • Henckens SPG; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Liu D; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Gisbertz SS; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Kalff MC; Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Anderegg MCJ; Centre for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Crull D; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Daams F; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • van Dalsen AD; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Dekker JWT; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • van Det MJ; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • van Duijvendijk P; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Eshuis WJ; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Groenendijk RPR; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Haveman JW; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • van Hillegersberg R; Department of Surgery, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands.
  • Luyer MDP; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Olthof PB; Department of Surgery, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
  • Pierie JEN; Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Groep, Delft, the Netherlands.
  • Plat VD; Department of Surgery, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands.
  • Rosman C; Department of Surgery, Gelre Ziekenhuis, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands.
  • Ruurda JP; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • van Sandick JW; Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Sosef MN; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Voeten DM; Department of Surgery, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle aan den IJssel, the Netherlands.
  • Vijgen GHEJ; Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Bijlsma MF; Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
  • Meijer SL; Department of Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
  • Hulshof MCCM; Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Groep, Delft, the Netherlands.
  • Oyarce C; Department of Surgery, MC Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands.
  • Lagarde SM; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • van Laarhoven HWM; Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • van Berge Henegouwen MI; Department of Surgery, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Br J Surg ; 111(2)2024 Jan 31.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38387083
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study evaluated the association of pathological tumour response (tumour regression grade, TRG) and a novel scoring system, combining both TRG and nodal status (TRG-ypN score; TRG1-ypN0, TRG>1-ypN0, TRG1-ypN+ and TRG>1-ypN+), with recurrence patterns and survival after multimodal treatment of oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS:

This Dutch nationwide cohort study included patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by oesophagectomy for distal oesophageal or gastro-oesophageal junctional adenocarcinoma between 2007 and 2016. The primary endpoint was the association of Mandard score and TRG-ypN score with recurrence patterns (rate, location, and time to recurrence). The secondary endpoint was overall survival.

RESULTS:

Among 2746 inclusions, recurrence rates increased with higher Mandard scores (TRG1 30.6%, TRG2 44.9%, TRG3 52.9%, TRG4 61.4%, TRG5 58.2%; P < 0.001). Among patients with recurrent disease, the distribution (locoregional versus distant) was the same for the different TRG groups. Patients with TRG1 developed more brain recurrences (17.7 versus 9.8%; P = 0.001) and had a longer mean overall survival (44 versus 35 months; P < 0.001) than those with TRG>1. The TRG>1-ypN+ group had the highest recurrence rate (64.9%) and worst overall survival (mean 27 months). Compared with the TRG>1-ypN0 group, patients with TRG1-ypN+ had a higher risk of recurrence (51.9 versus 39.6%; P < 0.001) and worse mean overall survival (33 versus 41 months; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

Improved tumour response to neoadjuvant therapy was associated with lower recurrence rates and higher overall survival rates. Among patients with recurrent disease, TRG1 was associated with a higher incidence of brain recurrence than TRG>1. Residual nodal disease influenced prognosis more negatively than residual disease at the primary tumour site.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Adenocarcinoma Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Adenocarcinoma Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article