Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluating novel biodegradable polymer matrix fertilizers for nitrogen-efficient agriculture.
Witt, Torsten; Robinson, Nicole; Palma, Ana C; Cernusak, Lucas A; Pratt, Steven; Redding, Matthew; Batstone, Damien J; Schmidt, Susanne; Laycock, Bronwyn.
  • Witt T; School of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
  • Robinson N; School of Agriculture and Food Sustainability, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
  • Palma AC; College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia.
  • Cernusak LA; College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia.
  • Pratt S; School of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
  • Redding M; Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.
  • Batstone DJ; Australian Centre for Water and Environmental Biotechnology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
  • Schmidt S; School of Agriculture and Food Sustainability, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
  • Laycock B; School of Chemical Engineering, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
J Environ Qual ; 53(3): 287-299, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38453688
ABSTRACT
Enhanced efficiency fertilizers (EEFs) can reduce nitrogen (N) losses in temperate agriculture but are less effective in the tropics. We aimed to design a new EEF and evaluate their performance in simple-to-complex tests with tropical soils and crops. We melt-extruded urea at different loadings into biodegradable polymer matrix composites using biodegradable polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) or polybutylene adipate-co-terephthalate (PBAT) polymers with urea distributed throughout the pellet. These contrast with commercially coated EEF that have a polymer-coated urea core. We hypothesized that matrix fertilizers would have an intermediate N release rate compared to fast release from urea or slow release from coated EEF. Nitrogen release rates in water and sand-soil columns confirmed that the matrix fertilizer formulations had a more progressive N release than a coated EEF. A more complex picture emerged from testing sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] grown to maturity in large soil pots, as the different formulations resulted in minor differences in plant N accumulation and grain production. This confirms the need to consider soil interactions, microbial processes, crop physiology, and phenology for evaluating fertilizer performance. Promisingly, crop δ15N signatures emerged as an integrated measure of efficacy, tracking likely N conversions and losses. The three complementary evaluations combine the advantages of standardized high-throughput screening and more resource-intensive and realistic testing in a plant-soil system. We conclude that melt-blended biodegradable polymer matrix fertilizers show promise as EEF because they can be designed toward more abiotically or more microbially driven N release by selecting biopolymer type and N loading rate.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Polímeros / Agricultura / Fertilizantes / Nitrógeno Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Polímeros / Agricultura / Fertilizantes / Nitrógeno Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article