Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon vs Uncoated Balloon for Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: The AGENT IDE Randomized Clinical Trial.
Yeh, Robert W; Shlofmitz, Richard; Moses, Jeffrey; Bachinsky, William; Dohad, Suhail; Rudick, Steven; Stoler, Robert; Jefferson, Brian K; Nicholson, William; Altman, John; Bateman, Cinthia; Krishnaswamy, Amar; Grantham, J Aaron; Zidar, Frank J; Marso, Steven P; Tremmel, Jennifer A; Grines, Cindy; Ahmed, Mustafa I; Latib, Azeem; Tehrani, Behnam; Abbott, J Dawn; Batchelor, Wayne; Underwood, Paul; Allocco, Dominic J; Kirtane, Ajay J.
  • Yeh RW; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Shlofmitz R; St Francis Hospital, Roslyn, New York.
  • Moses J; Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York.
  • Bachinsky W; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
  • Dohad S; Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
  • Rudick S; Lindner Center for Research and Education at Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  • Stoler R; Baylor Scott & White Heart and Vascular Hospital, Dallas, Texas.
  • Jefferson BK; HCA Tristar Centennial Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
  • Nicholson W; Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Altman J; St Anthony Hospital, Denver, Colorado.
  • Bateman C; South Denver Cardiology, Littleton, Colorado.
  • Krishnaswamy A; Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Grantham JA; St Luke's Hospital of Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri.
  • Zidar FJ; Austin Heart, Austin, Texas.
  • Marso SP; Overland Park Regional Medical Center, Overland Park, Kansas.
  • Tremmel JA; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California.
  • Grines C; Northside Hospital Cardiovascular Institute, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Ahmed MI; University of Alabama at Birmingham.
  • Latib A; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
  • Tehrani B; The Inova Schar Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia.
  • Abbott JD; Lifespan Cardiovascular Institute, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence.
  • Batchelor W; The Inova Schar Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia.
  • Underwood P; Boston Scientific Corp, Marlborough, Massachusetts.
  • Allocco DJ; Boston Scientific Corp, Marlborough, Massachusetts.
  • Kirtane AJ; Columbia University Irving Medical Center/NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York.
JAMA ; 331(12): 1015-1024, 2024 03 26.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38460161
ABSTRACT
Importance Drug-coated balloons offer a potentially beneficial treatment strategy for the management of coronary in-stent restenosis. However, none have been previously evaluated or approved for use in coronary circulation in the United States.

Objective:

To evaluate whether a paclitaxel-coated balloon is superior to an uncoated balloon in patients with in-stent restenosis undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Design, Setting, and

Participants:

AGENT IDE, a multicenter randomized clinical trial, enrolled 600 patients with in-stent restenosis (lesion length <26 mm and reference vessel diameter >2.0 mm to ≤4.0 mm) at 40 centers across the United States between May 2021 and August 2022. One-year clinical follow-up was completed on October 2, 2023.

Interventions:

Participants were randomized in a 21 allocation to undergo treatment with a paclitaxel-coated (n = 406) or an uncoated (n = 194) balloon. Main Outcomes and

Measures:

The primary end point of 1-year target lesion failure-defined as the composite of ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or cardiac death-was tested for superiority.

Results:

Among 600 randomized patients (mean age, 68 years; 157 females [26.2%]; 42 Black [7%], 35 Hispanic [6%] individuals), 574 (95.7%) completed 1-year follow-up. The primary end point at 1 year occurred in 17.9% in the paclitaxel-coated balloon group vs 28.6% in the uncoated balloon group, meeting the criteria for superiority (hazard ratio [HR], 0.59 [95% CI, 0.42-0.84]; 2-sided P = .003). Target lesion revascularization (13.0% vs 24.7%; HR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.34-0.74]; P = .001) and target vessel-related myocardial infarction (5.8% vs 11.1%; HR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.28-0.92]; P = .02) occurred less frequently among patients treated with paclitaxel-coated balloon. The rate of cardiac death was 2.9% vs 1.6% (HR, 1.75 [95% CI, 0.49-6.28]; P = .38) in the coated vs uncoated balloon groups, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance Among patients undergoing coronary angioplasty for in-stent restenosis, a paclitaxel-coated balloon was superior to an uncoated balloon with respect to the composite end point of target lesion failure. Paclitaxel-coated balloons are an effective treatment option for patients with coronary in-stent restenosis. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04647253.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Reestenosis Coronaria / Infarto del Miocardio Límite: Aged / Female / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Reestenosis Coronaria / Infarto del Miocardio Límite: Aged / Female / Humans Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article