Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Distribution and characteristics of bacteria on the hand during oropharyngeal swab collection: Which handwashing points are affected?
Chen, Nuo; He, Wenbin; Chen, Xiaoyan; Li, Yan; Cheng, Xiaolin; Liu, Li; Qian, Hua; Qiao, Fu; Cheng, Fan; Deng, Yi; Wu, Wenwen; Feng, Bilong; Wang, Ying.
  • Chen N; School of Public Health and Management, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China.
  • He W; Department of Infection Prevention and Control Management, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
  • Chen X; Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
  • Li Y; Department of Nursing, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
  • Cheng X; Department of Infection Prevention and Control Management, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
  • Liu L; Department of Nursing, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
  • Qian H; Department of Building Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
  • Qiao F; Hubei Engineering Center for Infectious Disease Prevention, Control and Treatment, Wuhan, China.
  • Cheng F; Hubei Engineering Center for Infectious Disease Prevention, Control and Treatment, Wuhan, China.
  • Deng Y; School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
  • Wu W; Infection Prevention and Control Department, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Feng B; Department of Infection Prevention and Control Management, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
  • Wang Y; Department of Building Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
J Clin Nurs ; 2024 Mar 22.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38519848
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

To identify the contaminated areas of the hand collection and analyse the distribution characteristics of bacteria in the hand after swab collection.

DESIGN:

This study used a cross-sectional design.

METHODS:

A cross-sectional study sampling 50 pairs of hands (sampling hand and auxiliary hand) of healthcare workers was performed. Ten samples were collected from each participant. The optimal hand hygiene rates and bacterial colony counts of the whole hand and different hand sections without hand hygiene were identified as the primary outcomes.

RESULTS:

The optimal hand hygiene rates of the sampling hand and auxiliary hand were 88.8% (222/250) and 91.6% (229/250), respectively. The lowest optimal hand hygiene rates for the sampling hand and the auxiliary hand were both on the dorsal side of the finger and the dorsum of the hand (86.0%, 86.0% vs. 90.0%, 86.0%); the optimal hand hygiene rates for both sites of the sampling hand were 86.0% (43/50), and the optimal hand hygiene rates for the auxiliary hand were 90.0% (45/50) and 86.0% (43/50). The bacteria colony counts did not differ between the sampling hands and auxiliary hand.

CONCLUSIONS:

The dorsal side of the finger and dorsum of the hand were the most likely to be contaminated during oropharyngeal swab collection. Therefore, it is essential to pay extra attention to hand hygiene care of these two sites during the collection process to minimize the risk of cross-contamination. REPORTING

METHOD:

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines were adopted in this study.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article