Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Defining integrity: An approach and military application.
Darr, Wendy; Fors Brandebo, Maria; Zajícová, Markéta; Verboom, Marjolein; Kai, Nyman; Wolgers, Gerhard.
  • Darr W; Director General Military Personnel Research & Analysis, Department of National Defence, Ottawa, Canada.
  • Fors Brandebo M; Department of Leadership and Command & Control, Swedish Defence University, Karlstaad, Sweden.
  • Zajícová M; Military University Hospital, Czech Armed Forces, Prague, Czechia/Czech Republic.
  • Verboom M; Department for Recruitment & Selection, Netherlands Armed Forces, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  • Kai N; Human Performance Division, Finnish Defence Research Agency, Tuusula, Finland.
  • Wolgers G; Swedish Armed Forces, Human Resources Centre, Swedish Armed Forces, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mil Psychol ; 34(5): 591-603, 2022.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38536345
ABSTRACT
Personnel selection research has seen an increasing interest in integrity tests. Although these tests have been found to predict a variety of workplace criteria, a long-standing criticism of integrity tests is their criterion-focussed nature. A construct-oriented approach to integrity test development involves identifying important elements of integrity and developing content to reflect those elements. Drawing upon earlier attempts to define integrity, this paper conceptualizes integrity as a behavior, and elaborates on two definitional elements, nature of standards and their referent. Undertaking a content analysis of the high-level codes of conduct of 13 military nations, this paper illustrates the application of an approach to defining integrity for use in the military context. It includes a discussion on the operationalization of integrity for assessment purposes, highlighting considerations that must be given to all aspects of the assessment development process.
Palabras clave