Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Using the Behaviour Change Wheel to identify barriers and targeted strategies to improve adherence in randomised clinical trials: The example of MEL-SELF trial of patient-led surveillance for melanoma.
Ackermann, Deonna M; Hersch, Jolyn K; Janda, Monika; Bracken, Karen; Turner, Robin M; Bell, Katy J L.
  • Ackermann DM; Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: deonna.ackermann@sydney.edu.au.
  • Hersch JK; Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Australia.
  • Janda M; Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Bracken K; Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Australia.
  • Turner RM; Biostatistics Centre, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
  • Bell KJL; Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Australia.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 140: 107513, 2024 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38537902
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Adherence to self-management interventions is critical in both clinical settings and trials to ensure maximal effectiveness. This study reports how the Behaviour Change Wheel may be used to assess barriers to self-management behaviours and develop strategies to maximise adherence in a trial setting (the MEL-SELF trial of patient-led melanoma surveillance).

METHODS:

The Behaviour Change Wheel was applied by (i) using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COMB) model informed by empirical and review data to identify adherence barriers, (ii) mapping identified barriers to corresponding intervention functions, and (iii) identifying appropriate behaviour change techniques and developing potential solutions using the APEASE (Affordability, Practicability, Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, Acceptability, Side-effects and safety, Equity) criteria.

RESULTS:

The target adherence behaviour was defined as conducting a thorough skin self-examination and submitting images for teledermatology review. Key barriers identified included non-engaged skin check partners, inadequate planning, time constraints, low self-efficacy, and technological difficulties. Participants' motivation was positively influenced by perceived health benefits and negatively impacted by emotional states such as anxiety and depression. We identified the following feasible interventions to support adherence education, training, environmental restructuring, enablement, persuasion, and incentivisation. Proposed solutions included action planning, calendar scheduling, alternative dermatoscopes, optimised communication, educational resources in various formats to boost self-efficacy and motivation and optimised reminders (which will be evaluated in a Study Within A Trial (SWAT)).

CONCLUSION:

The Behaviour Change Wheel may be used to improve adherence in clinical trials by identifying barriers to self-management behaviours and guiding development of targeted strategies.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Cutáneas / Cooperación del Paciente / Autoeficacia / Melanoma / Motivación Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Cutáneas / Cooperación del Paciente / Autoeficacia / Melanoma / Motivación Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article