Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sociodemographic and geographic disparities in COVID-19 booster vaccination in Nueces County, Texas, USA.
Huang, Yuxia; Lee, Jim; Jin, Lei; Rahman, Md Mahabubur; Guerrero, Ana; Zhao, Meng; Lee, Kyoung.
  • Huang Y; Department of Computing Sciences, College of Engineering, Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, TX, USA.
  • Lee J; College of Business, Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, TX, USA.
  • Jin L; Department of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Science, Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, TX, USA.
  • Rahman MM; Department of Computing Sciences, College of Engineering, Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, TX, USA.
  • Guerrero A; Department of Computing Sciences, College of Engineering, Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, TX, USA.
  • Zhao M; School of Nursing, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC, USA.
  • Lee K; School of Nursing, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Heliyon ; 10(6): e27763, 2024 Mar 30.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38545159
ABSTRACT

Objective:

This paper explores sociodemographic determinants and geographic disparities in COVID-19 booster uptake among fully vaccinated adults in Nueces County, Texas, USA with a population of over 353,000.

Methods:

A logistic generalized additive model was applied to analyze 184,252 official vaccination records of fully vaccinated adults over the period between December 2020 and August 2022. An individual's odds in receiving a booster shot were estimated with a host of sociodemographic characteristics as predictors.

Results:

Model estimation results reveal that male (odds ratio 0.836, 95% confidence interval 0.835-0.836, p < 0.001) and Hispanic residents (odds ratio 0.944, 95% confidence interval 0.943-0.945, p < 0.001) in the county were less likely to take a booster shot. Between the ages of 25 and 75, booster uptake increased with age (age 75 vs. 45 odd ratio 3.058, 95% confidence interval 3.052-3.063, p < 0.001). Booster uptake was lower in rural areas (odds ratio 0.804, 95% confidence interval 0.795-0.814, p < 0.001) and communities with high social vulnerability (highest vs. moderate vulnerability odd ratio 0.800, 95% confidence interval 0.767-0.836, p < 0.001).

Conclusion:

Empirical results confirm that booster uptake varied across individuals and communities of different socioeconomic and demographic characteristics. To advance health equity, a more inclusive vaccine campaign should pay particular attention to those underserved populations.
Palabras clave