Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Transfemoral prosthetic simulators versus amputees: ground reaction forces and spatio-temporal parameters in gait.
Kobayashi, Toshiki; Jor, Abu; He, Yufan; Hu, Mingyu; Koh, Mark W P; Hisano, Genki; Hara, Takeshi; Hobara, Hiroaki.
  • Kobayashi T; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
  • Jor A; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
  • He Y; Department of Leather Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Khulna University of Engineering & Technology, Khulna, Bangladesh.
  • Hu M; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
  • Koh MWP; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
  • Hisano G; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.
  • Hara T; Faculty of Advanced Engineering, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Hobara H; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), Tokyo, Japan.
R Soc Open Sci ; 11(3): 231854, 2024 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38545618
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to compare the ground reaction forces (GRFs) and spatio-temporal parameters as well as their asymmetry ratios in gait between individuals wearing a transfemoral prosthetic simulator (TFSim) and individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation (TFAmp) across a range of walking speeds (2.0-5.5 km h-1). The study recruited 10 non-disabled individuals using TFSim and 10 individuals with unilateral TFAmp using a transfemoral prosthesis. Data were collected using an instrumented treadmill with built-in force plates, and subsequently, the GRFs and spatio-temporal parameters, as well as their asymmetry ratios, were analysed. When comparing the TFSim and TFAmp groups, no significant differences were found among the gait parameters and asymmetry ratios of all tested metrics except the vertical GRFs. The TFSim may not realistically reproduce the vertical GRFs during the weight acceptance and push-off phases. The structural and functional variations in prosthetic limbs and components between the TFSim and TFAmp groups may be primary contributors to the difference in the vertical GRFs. These results suggest that TFSim might be able to emulate the gait of individuals with TFAmp regarding the majority of spatio-temporal and GRF parameters. However, the vertical GRFs of TFSim should be interpreted with caution.
Palabras clave