Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Changes in the ability to correctly identify schizophrenia and depression: results from general population surveys in Germany over 30 years.
Grohmann, Elise; Al-Addous, Amani; Sander, Christian; Dogan-Sander, Ezgi; Baumann, Eva; Angermeyer, Matthias C; Schomerus, Georg.
  • Grohmann E; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Centre, Leipzig, Germany. elisegrohmann@gmx.de.
  • Al-Addous A; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Centre, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Sander C; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Centre, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Dogan-Sander E; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Centre, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Baumann E; Department of Journalism and Communication Research, Hannover University of Music, Drama, and Media, Hannover, Germany.
  • Angermeyer MC; Centre for Public Mental Health, Gösing am Wagram, Austria.
  • Schomerus G; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Centre, Leipzig, Germany.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38583103
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This study aims to examine time trends in the ability to correctly identify schizophrenia and major depression within the German general population from 1990 to 2020, as an indicator of changing mental health literacy (MHL). Additionally, we investigated shifts in the use of stigmatizing language.

METHODS:

Our analysis is based on four waves of representative population surveys in Germany in 1990/1993 (West Germany N = 2044, East Germany N = 1563), 2001 (N = 5025), 2011 (N = 2455), and 2020 (N = 3042) using identical methodology. Respondents were presented with an unlabelled case vignette describing a person who exhibited symptoms of either schizophrenia or major depression. Participants were then asked to name the problem described in the vignette using an open-ended question.

RESULTS:

From 1990/1993 to 2020, correct identification of schizophrenia increased from 18% to 34% and from 27% to 46% for major depression. However, derogatory labels remained constant throughout all survey waves, particularly for schizophrenia (19% in 1990/1993 and 18% in 2020). For depression, more trivializing and potentially devaluing statements were recorded.

CONCLUSION:

Despite the increasing use of psychiatric terminology among the general population, the persistence of derogatory labels suggests that improved MHL, reflected in higher recognition rates, may not automatically translate into a reduction in stigmatizing language. With depression, a normalization and trivialization of a severe illness could pose new challenges to people with major depression. Dedicated efforts to combat the stigma of severe mental illness are still needed.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article