Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sessile serrated polyp detection rates after fecal immunochemical test or multitarget stool DNA test: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Garg, Rajat; Burke, Carol A; Aggarwal, Manik; Macaron, Carole; Singh, Amandeep; Kim, Michelle K; Regueiro, Miguel; Amit, Bhatt; Chahal, Prabhleen; Garg, Shashank.
  • Garg R; Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, United States.
  • Burke CA; Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, United States.
  • Aggarwal M; Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, United States.
  • Macaron C; Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, United States.
  • Singh A; Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, United States.
  • Kim MK; Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, United States.
  • Regueiro M; Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, United States.
  • Amit B; Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, United States.
  • Chahal P; Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, United States.
  • Garg S; Medicine, University of Arkansas System, Little Rock, United States.
Endosc Int Open ; 12(4): E474-E487, 2024 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38585019
ABSTRACT
Background and study aims Published studies report a higher adenoma detection rate (ADR) for FIT-DNA as compared with FIT. Data are less replete about the performance of stool-based tests for sessile serrated polyp (SSP) detection. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the performance of FIT and FIT-DNA testing for SSP detection rate (SSPDR) in patients undergoing colonoscopy for follow up of positive noninvasive tests. Methods A comprehensive literature search of multiple databases (until September 2022) was performed to identify studies reporting SSPDR in patients with positive FIT or FIT-DNA tests. The outcome was overall colonoscopy detection of any SSPs and advanced serrated polyps (ASP SSP ≥ 10 mm and/or dysplasia). Results Included were 482,405 patients (52.4% females) with a mean age of 62.3 ± 4.4 years from 23 studies. The pooled SSPDR for all positive stool-based tests was 5.3% and higher for FIT-DNA (15.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.3-25.7) versus FIT (4.1%, 95% CI 3.0-5.6; P = 0.0002). The overall pooled ASP detection rate was 1.4% (95% CI 0.81-2.3) and higher for FIT-DNA (3.8 %, 95% CI 1.7-8.6) compared with FIT (0.71%, 95% CI 0.36-1.4; P <0.01). SSPDR with FIT-DNA was also significantly higher than FIT when the FIT cutoff was >10 ug/g and in FIT-positive patients in studies conducted in North America ( P <0.05). Conclusions FIT-DNA outperformed FIT in both SSP and ASP detection including FIT with a lower threshold cutoff of >10 ug/g. Further comparative studies are needed to assess the impact of our findings on colorectal cancer reduction.
Palabras clave