Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cefadroxil and cephalexin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in children with musculoskeletal infections.
Haynes, Andrew S; Wei, Zixuan; Anderson, Peter; Scheetz, Marc H; Parker, Sarah K; Fish, Douglas N.
  • Haynes AS; Children's Hospital Colorado, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Wei Z; University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Anderson P; University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Scheetz MH; University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Parker SK; Midwestern University, Pharmacometrics Center of Excellence, Colleges of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Downers Grove, Illinois, USA.
  • Fish DN; Children's Hospital Colorado, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 68(5): e0018224, 2024 May 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38597672
ABSTRACT
Cephalexin, a first-generation cephalosporin, is the first-line oral therapy for children with musculoskeletal infections due to methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). Cefadroxil, a similar first-generation cephalosporin, is an attractive alternative to cephalexin given its longer half-life. In this study, we describe the comparative pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of cephalexin and cefadroxil in children with musculoskeletal infections. Children aged 6 months to 18 years with a musculoskeletal infection were enrolled in a prospective, open-label, crossover PK study and given single oral doses of cefadroxil (50-75 mg/kg up to 2,000 mg) and cephalexin (50 mg/kg up to 1,375 mg). Population PK models were developed and used for dosing simulations. Our primary PD target was the achievement of free antibiotic concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT >MIC) for 40% of the day for MICs ≤ 4 mg/L. PK of cephalexin (n = 15) and cefadroxil (n = 14) were best described using a one-compartment, first-order absorption model, with a lag time component for cefadroxil. PK parameters were notable for cefadroxil's longer half-life (1.61 h) than cephalexin's (1.10 h). For pediatric weight bands, our primary PD target was achieved by cephalexin 25 mg/kg/dose, maximum 750 mg/dose, administered three times daily and cefadroxil 40 mg/kg/dose, maximum 1,500 mg/dose, administered twice daily. More aggressive dosing was required to achieve higher PD targets. Among children with musculoskeletal infections, oral cephalexin and cefadroxil achieved PD targets for efficacy against MSSA. Given less frequent dosing, twice-daily cefadroxil should be further considered as an alternative to cephalexin for oral step-down therapy for serious infections due to MSSA.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana / Cefadroxilo / Cefalexina / Estudios Cruzados / Antibacterianos Límite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana / Cefadroxilo / Cefalexina / Estudios Cruzados / Antibacterianos Límite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article