Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of 30-day outcomes for open ventral hernia repair using self-gripping versus nonself-gripping mesh.
Bahraini, Anoosh; Hsu, Justin; Cochran, Steven; Campbell, Shannelle; Overby, David Wayne; Phillips, Sharon; Prabhu, Ajita; Perez, Arielle.
  • Bahraini A; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 101 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA.
  • Hsu J; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 101 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA.
  • Cochran S; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 101 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA.
  • Campbell S; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 101 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA.
  • Overby DW; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 101 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA.
  • Phillips S; Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA.
  • Prabhu A; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA.
  • Perez A; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 101 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA. Arielle_perez@med.unc.edu.
Surg Endosc ; 38(5): 2871-2878, 2024 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38609587
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The use of mesh is standard of care for large ventral hernias repaired on an elective basis. The most used type of mesh includes synthetic polypropylene mesh; however, there has been an increase in the usage of a new polyester self-gripping mesh, and there are limited data regarding its efficacy for ventral hernia. The purpose of the study is to determine whether there is a difference in surgical site occurrence (SSO), surgical site infection (SSI), surgical site occurrence requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI), and recurrence at 30 days after ventral hernia repair (VHR) using self-gripping (SGM) versus non-self-gripping mesh (NSGM).

METHODS:

We performed a retrospective study from January 2014 to April 2022 using the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC). We collected data on patients over 18 years of age who underwent elective open VHR using SGM or NSGM and whom had 30-day follow-up. Propensity matching was utilized to control for variables including hernia width, body mass index, age, ASA, and mesh location. Data were analyzed to identify differences in SSO, SSI, SSOPI, and recurrence at 30 days.

RESULTS:

9038 patients were identified. After propensity matching, 1766 patients were included in the study population. Patients with SGM had similar demographic and clinical characteristics compared to NSGM. The mean hernia width to mesh width ratio was 8 cm18 cm with NSGM and 7 cm15 cm with SGM (p = 0.63). There was no difference in 30-day rates of recurrence, SSI or SSO. The rate of SSOPI was also found to be 5.4% in the nonself-gripping group compared to 3.1% in the self-gripping mesh group (p < .005). There was no difference in patient-reported outcomes at 30 days.

CONCLUSIONS:

In patients undergoing ventral hernia repair with mesh, self-gripping mesh is a safe type of mesh to use. Use of self-gripping mesh may be associated with lower rates of SSOPI when compared to nonself-gripping mesh.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Recurrencia / Mallas Quirúrgicas / Herniorrafia / Hernia Ventral Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Recurrencia / Mallas Quirúrgicas / Herniorrafia / Hernia Ventral Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article