Comparison of 1-stage and 2-stage Managements for Common Bile Duct Stones and Gallstones (CBDS): A Retrospective Study.
J Clin Gastroenterol
; 2024 Apr 23.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38648497
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and surgical outcomes of 2-stage management, namely preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) + laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ERCP+LC) or LC + postoperative ERCP (LC+ERCP), as well as 1-stage management, LC + laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) for treating patients with gallstones and common bile duct stones (CBDS).METHODS:
This retrospective study analyzed the data of 180 patients with common bile duct stones (CBDS) who were admitted to the Department of General Surgery at Tongji Hospital, Tongji University, between January 2019 and June 2021. The study included 3 groups ERCP+LC (group 1), LC+ERCP (group 2), and LC+LCBDE (group 3), each consisting of 60 patients. Clinical metrics of the patients were collected and compared among the groups.RESULTS:
Group 3 had the shortest operation duration and hospital stay compared with group 1 and group 2. In addition, group 3 had the lowest long-term postoperative complications, particularly the recurrence rate of CBDS. The total cost was also the lowest in group 3. Furthermore, patients in group 3 had the lowest postoperative amylase levels. All patients in the study achieved successful stone clearance. There were no significant differences in the conversion to other procedures rate, postoperative alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin, and mortality among the three groups (P > 0.05).CONCLUSIONS:
Both 1-stage management and 2-stage management are effective treatments for CBDS. The LC+LCBDE management is a safe treatment option, offering shorter hospital stays and operation duration, lower costs, and fewer complications.
Texto completo:
1
Banco de datos:
MEDLINE
Idioma:
En
Año:
2024
Tipo del documento:
Article