Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The political fallout of air pollution.
Bellani, Luna; Ceolotto, Stefano; Elsner, Benjamin; Pestel, Nico.
  • Bellani L; Department of Economics, Ulm University, Ulm 89081, Germany.
  • Ceolotto S; Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn 53113, Germany.
  • Elsner B; AXA Research Lab on Gender Equality at Centre for Research on Social Dynamics and Public Policy (DONDENA), Milan 20136, Italy.
  • Pestel N; Risk Assessment and Adaptation Strategies (RAAS), Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change and Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Edificio Porta dell'Innovazione - Piano 2, Venezia Marghera 30175, Italy.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 121(18): e2314428121, 2024 Apr 30.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38652743
ABSTRACT
This paper studies the effect of air pollution on voting outcomes. We use data from 60 federal and state elections in Germany from 2000 to 2018 and exploit plausibly exogenous fluctuations in ambient air pollution within counties across election dates. Higher air pollution on election day shifts votes away from incumbent parties and toward opposition parties. An increase in the concentration of particulate matter (PM10) by 10 [Formula see text]g/m[Formula see text]-around two within-county SDs-reduces the vote share of incumbent parties by two percentage points, which is equivalent to 4% of the mean vote share. We generalize these findings by documenting similar effects with data from a weekly opinion poll and a large-scale panel survey. We provide further evidence that poor air quality leads to more negative emotions such as anger, worry, and unhappiness, which, in turn, may reduce the support for the political status quo. Overall, these results suggest that poor air quality affects decision-making in the population at large, including consequential political decisions.
Palabras clave