Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dacryocystorhinostomy videos on YouTube as a source of patient education.
Singh, Gurfarmaan; Goel, Raghav; Shapira, Yinon; Hewitt, Joseph; Ovenden, Christopher; Selva, Dinesh.
  • Singh G; The University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia. 1996garrysingh@gmail.com.
  • Goel R; Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Port Road, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia. 1996garrysingh@gmail.com.
  • Shapira Y; The University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
  • Hewitt J; Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Port Road, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
  • Ovenden C; Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Port Road, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
  • Selva D; The University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Int Ophthalmol ; 44(1): 192, 2024 Apr 23.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38653839
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To determine the quality and reliability of DCR YouTube videos as patient education resources and identify any associated factors predictive of video quality.

METHODS:

A YouTube search was conducted using the terms "Dacryocystorhinostomy, DCR, surgery" on 12th of January 2022, with the first 50 relevant videos selected for inclusion. For each video, the following was collected video hyperlink, title, total views, months since the video was posted, video length, total likes/dislikes, authorship (i.e. surgeon, patient experience or media companies) and number of comments. The videos were graded independently by a resident, a registrar and an oculoplastic surgeon using three validated scoring systems the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), DISCERN, and Health on the Net (HON).

RESULTS:

The average number of video views was 22,992, with the mean length being 488.12 s and an average of 18 comments per video. The consensus JAMA, DISCERN and HON scores were 2.1 ± 0.6, 29.1 ± 8.8 and 2.7 ± 1.0, respectively. This indicated that the included videos were of a low quality, however, only DISCERN scores had good interobserver similarity. Videos posted by surgeons were superior to non-surgeons when considering mean JAMA and HON scores. No other factors were associated with the quality of educational content.

CONCLUSION:

The quality and reliability of DCR related content for patient education is relatively low. Based on this study's findings, patients should be encouraged to view videos created by surgeons or specialists in preference to other sources on YouTube.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Grabación en Video / Dacriocistorrinostomía / Educación del Paciente como Asunto / Medios de Comunicación Sociales Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Grabación en Video / Dacriocistorrinostomía / Educación del Paciente como Asunto / Medios de Comunicación Sociales Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article