Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
From learned value to sustained bias: how reward conditioning changes attentional priority.
Meyer, Kristin N; Hopfinger, Joseph B; Vidrascu, Elena M; Boettiger, Charlotte A; Robinson, Donita L; Sheridan, Margaret A.
  • Meyer KN; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
  • Hopfinger JB; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
  • Vidrascu EM; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
  • Boettiger CA; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
  • Robinson DL; Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
  • Sheridan MA; Biomedical Research Imaging Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Front Hum Neurosci ; 18: 1354142, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38689827
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Attentional bias to reward-associated stimuli can occur even when it interferes with goal-driven behavior. One theory posits that dopaminergic signaling in the striatum during reward conditioning leads to changes in visual cortical and parietal representations of the stimulus used, and this, in turn, sustains attentional bias even when reward is discontinued. However, only a few studies have examined neural activity during both rewarded and unrewarded task phases.

Methods:

In the current study, participants first completed a reward-conditioning phase, during which responses to certain stimuli were associated with monetary reward. These stimuli were then included as non-predictive cues in a spatial cueing task. Participants underwent functional brain imaging during both task phases.

Results:

The results show that striatal activity during the learning phase predicted increased visual cortical and parietal activity and decreased ventro-medial prefrontal cortex activity in response to conditioned stimuli during the test. Striatal activity was also associated with anterior cingulate cortex activation when the reward-conditioned stimulus directed attention away from the target.

Discussion:

Our findings suggest that striatal activity during reward conditioning predicts the degree to which reward history biases attention through learning-induced changes in visual and parietal activities.
Palabras clave