Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of endovascular therapy for cerebral vasospasm following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ma, Yu-Hu; Shang, Rui; Li, Si-Hao; Wang, Ting; Lin, Sen; Zhang, Chang-Wei.
  • Ma YH; Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
  • Shang R; Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
  • Li SH; Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
  • Wang T; Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
  • Lin S; Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
  • Zhang CW; Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Front Neurol ; 15: 1360511, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38715691
ABSTRACT

Background:

Cerebral vasospasm (CV) is a common complication of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), leading to increased morbidity and mortality rates. Endovascular therapy, particularly intra-arterial vasodilator infusion (IAVI), has emerged as a potential alternative treatment for CV.

Methods:

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare the efficacy of endovascular therapy with standard treatment in patients with CV following aSAH. The primary outcomes assessed were in-hospital mortality, discharge favorable outcome, and follow-up favorable outcome. Secondary outcomes included major infarction on CT, ICU stay duration, and total hospital stay.

Results:

Regarding our primary outcomes of interest, patients undergoing intervention exhibited a significantly lower in-hospital mortality compared to the standard treatment group, with the intervention group having only half the mortality risk (RR = 0.49, 95% CI [0.29, 0.83], p = 0.008). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of discharge favorable outcome (RR = 0.99, 95% CI [0.68, 1.45], p = 0.963) and follow-up favorable outcome (RR = 1.09, 95% CI [0.86, 1.39], p = 0.485). Additionally, there was no significant difference in major infarction rates (RR = 0.79, 95% CI [0.34, 1.84], p = 0.588). It is important to note that patients undergoing endovascular treatment experienced longer stays in the ICU (MD = 6.07, 95% CI [1.03, 11.12], p = 0.018) and extended hospitalization (MD = 5.6, 95% CI [3.63, 7.56], p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses based on the mode of endovascular treatment further supported the benefits of IAVI in lowering in-hospital mortality (RR = 0.5, 95% CI [0.27, 0.91], p = 0.023).

Conclusion:

Endovascular therapy, particularly IAVI, holds promising potential in reducing in-hospital mortality for patients with CV following aSAH. However, it did not show significant improvement in long-term prognosis and functional recovery. Further research with larger sample sizes and randomized controlled trials is necessary to validate these findings and optimize the treatment strategy for cerebral vasospasm in aSAH patients. Systematic Review Registration https//www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42023451741.
Palabras clave