Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Infected Polypropylene Mesh: When Does Biofilm Form and Which Antiseptic Solution Most Effectively Removes It?
Jo, Suenghwan; Chao, Christina; Khilnani, Tyler K; Shenoy, Aarti; Bostrom, Mathias P G; Carli, Alberto V.
  • Jo S; School of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, South Korea.
  • Chao C; Department of Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
  • Khilnani TK; Department of Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
  • Shenoy A; Department of Biomechanics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
  • Bostrom MPG; Department of Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
  • Carli AV; Department of Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
J Arthroplasty ; 39(8S1): S294-S299, 2024 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38723699
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Polypropylene (PPE) mesh is commonly utilized to reconstruct catastrophic extensor mechanism disruptions in revision total knee arthroplasty. Unfortunately, these procedures are associated with a high rate of periprosthetic joint infection. The purpose of the current study was to 1) visualize and quantify the progression of bacterial biofilm growth on PPE-mesh; and 2) determine which antiseptic solutions effectively remove viable bacteria.

METHODS:

Knitted PPE mesh samples were cultured with either methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) or Escherichia coli (E. coli) for 7 days, with regular quantification of colony forming units (CFUs) and visualization using scanning electron microscopy to identify maturity. Immature (24 hour) and mature (72 hour) biofilm was treated with one of 5 commercial antiseptics for 3 minutes. A 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate, a surfactant-based formulation of ethanol, acetic acid, sodium acetate, benzalkonium chloride, diluted povidone-iodine (0.35%), undiluted (10%) povidone-iodine, and 11 combination of 10% povidone-iodine and 3% hydrogen peroxide. A 3-log reduction in CFUs compared to saline was considered clinically meaningful.

RESULTS:

The CFU counts plateaued, indicating maturity, at 72 hours for both MSSA and E. coli. The scanning electron microscopy confirmed confluent biofilm formation after 72 hours. The 10% povidone-iodine was clinically effective against all MSSA biofilms and immature E. coli biofilms. The 10% povidone-iodine with hydrogen peroxide was effective in all conditions. Only 10% povidone iodine formulations produced significantly (P < .0083) reduced CFU counts against mature biofilms.

CONCLUSIONS:

Bacteria rapidly form biofilm on PPE mesh. Mesh contamination can be catastrophic, and clinicians should consider utilizing an antiseptic solution at the conclusion of mesh implantation. Undiluted povidone-iodine with hydrogen peroxide should be considered when attempting to salvage infected PPE mesh.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Polipropilenos / Staphylococcus aureus / Mallas Quirúrgicas / Biopelículas / Escherichia coli / Antiinfecciosos Locales Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Polipropilenos / Staphylococcus aureus / Mallas Quirúrgicas / Biopelículas / Escherichia coli / Antiinfecciosos Locales Límite: Humans Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article