Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Provider opinions on effectiveness of physical therapy as treatment for glenohumeral arthritis.
Kane, Liam T; Mahmood, Hamd; Singh, Jaspal; Tate, Angela; Namdari, Surena.
  • Kane LT; Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Mahmood H; Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Singh J; Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Tate A; Department of Physical Therapy, Arcadia University, Glenside, PA, USA.
  • Namdari S; Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: Surena.namdari@gmail.com.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 33(8): e415-e421, 2024 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38734126
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Physical therapy (PT) is a described first-line treatment option for glenohumeral arthritis, but its efficacy for treating this spectrum of disease is not well understood. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the opinions of expert providers-orthopedic surgeons and physical therapists-regarding the utility of PT in treating glenohumeral arthritis in different stages of radiographic severity. Our goal is to identify areas of interprofessional majority agreement as well as areas without agreement that warrant further investigation.

METHODS:

A 35-question survey was created and distributed via email to members of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and the American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists, collecting information on demographics, professional experience, and the perceived benefit of PT for patients with different stages of glenohumeral arthritis based on radiographic severity. Survey responses were analyzed for inter-professional differences in distribution of answer choices as well as for majority agreement statements. Items with >50% agreement from a professional group were considered statements of majority agreement.

RESULTS:

One hundred and ninety surgeons and 39 physical therapists completed the survey. Surgeons and therapists demonstrated different distribution of answer choices in 25 of the 29 nondemographic related questions (86%). Surgeons and therapists reached the same majority statement in 8 items (28%) and reached disagreeing majority statements in 4 items (14%). They agreed on the benefits of PT for mild arthritis, the benefits of corticosteroid injections, the frequency of strengthening exercises, and that PT failure should not be required for surgical approval in patients with severe arthritis. They disagreed on the whether PT exacerbates symptoms in patients with moderate arthritis, and whether preoperative PT influences postoperative outcomes.

CONCLUSION:

Both surgeons and therapists agreed that PT may be less beneficial for patients with more advanced radiographic arthritis and that PT failure should not be required for insurance approval for surgical intervention in patients with severe glenohumeral arthritis. Further research is needed to determine the efficacy of PT for patients with moderate arthritis as well as the utility of preoperative PT for improving postoperative outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Artritis / Articulación del Hombro / Modalidades de Fisioterapia Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Artritis / Articulación del Hombro / Modalidades de Fisioterapia Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article