Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy plus immunotherapy for locally resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Yang, Guozhen; Yue, Haodong; Zhang, Xiaomin; Zeng, Chufeng; Tan, Linyu; Zhang, Xu.
  • Yang G; Department of Thoracic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
  • Yue H; Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Guangzhou, China.
  • Zhang X; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
  • Zeng C; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
  • Tan L; Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
  • Zhang X; School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1336798, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38779667
ABSTRACT

Background:

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (nCT + ICIs) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus immunotherapy (nCRT + ICIs) both induced favorable pathological response and tolerant toxicities for locally resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, few studies compared safety and efficacy between the two treatment strategies.

Methods:

This retrospective study collected clinical data of locally resectable ESCC patients who underwent nCT + ICIs or nCRT + ICIs followed by esophagectomy from November 2019 to December 2022. The incidence of adverse events, surgical outcomes, short and long-term efficacy, and treatment costs were compared.

Results:

A total of 206 patients were included, with a ratio of 15848 between nCT + ICIs group and nCRT + ICIs group. The two groups exhibited well-balanced baseline characteristics. Most adverse events were grade 1-2 in both groups. The nCT + ICIs group had a longer operative time (334.00 ± 170.2 min vs 279.60 ± 88.31 min, P=0.020) than nCRT + ICIs group, but there were no differences in surgical complications. Although nCT + ICIs group had a lower pCR rate (32.3% vs 52.1%, P=0.004), the 2-year overall survival (84.42% vs 81.70%, P=0.860), 2-year disease-free survival (83.21% vs 80.47%, P=0.839), and recurrence patterns were similar to nCRT + ICIs group. In addition, nCT + ICIs group had significantly lower expenses (188796.00 ± 107704.00 RMB vs 231808.00 ± 48067.00 RMB, P=0.045).

Conclusion:

Overall, nCT + ICIs have comparable safety and efficacy compared to nCRT + ICIs for locally resectable ESCC, but with lower hospitalization costs.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Esofagectomía / Terapia Neoadyuvante / Quimioradioterapia / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago / Inmunoterapia Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Esofagectomía / Terapia Neoadyuvante / Quimioradioterapia / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago / Inmunoterapia Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article