Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Elranatamab in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: results from MagnetisMM-2 and MagnetisMM-3.
Iida, Shinsuke; Ito, Satoshi; Yokoyama, Hisayuki; Ishida, Tadao; Nagai, Yuya; Handa, Hiroshi; Ito, Shigeki; Kamei, Yoichi; Nakamura, Masatoshi; Suzuki, Kenshi.
  • Iida S; Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kawasumi Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8602, Japan.
  • Ito S; Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Hematology and Cell Therapy, Yamagata University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
  • Yokoyama H; Department of Hematology and Rheumatology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
  • Ishida T; Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Nagai Y; Department of Hematology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
  • Handa H; Department of Hematology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.
  • Ito S; Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, Yahaba, Japan.
  • Kamei Y; Pfizer R&D Japan GK, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Nakamura M; Pfizer R&D Japan GK, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Suzuki K; Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 2024 May 24.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38794892
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Despite advances, most patients with multiple myeloma (MM) experience relapse and repeat multiple treatment lines, highlighting an unmet need for patients with relapsed or refractory MM (RRMM). Bispecific antibodies are a new option, but their efficacy and safety in Japanese patients are unknown.

METHODS:

This was an analysis of Japanese patients receiving elranatamab monotherapy in MagnetisMM-2 (NCT04798586) and MagnetisMM-3 (NCT04649359). Both studies evaluated a priming dose regimen of elranatamab followed by weekly subcutaneous doses, in patients with disease progression while receiving or who were intolerant to ≥3 prior therapies (≥1 proteasome inhibitor, ≥1 immunomodulatory drug and ≥1 anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody). The primary endpoints were dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) in MagnetisMM-2 and confirmed objective response rate (ORR) in MagnetisMM-3. In both, key secondary endpoints included safety, tolerability, duration of response, time to response, progression-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS:

In MagnetisMM-2 (N = 4) and MagnetisMM-3 (n = 12), median ages were 68.5 and 66.5 years, respectively. No DLTs were observed in MagnetisMM-2. ORRs were 50.0% (95% CI, 6.8-93.2) and 58.3% (95% CI, 27.7-84.8) in MagnetisMM-2 and MagnetisMM-3, respectively. All patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events in MagnetisMM-2 (grade 3/4 75.0%) and MagnetisMM-3 (grade 3/4 100%); cytokine release syndrome occurred in 100% (grade 3/4 25.0%) and 58.3% (no grade 3/4) of patients, respectively. Neither study reported immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS:

No new safety signals were observed, and ORRs were similar to that of the overall MagnetisMM-3 trial population, supporting further studies of elranatamab in Japanese patients with RRMM. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04798586 (MagnetisMM-2), NCT04649359 (MagnetisMM-3).
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article