Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Blue Ribbon Committee II Report and Recommendations on Surgical Education and Training in the United States: 2024.
Stain, Steven C; Ellison, E Christopher; Farmer, Diana L; Flynn, Timothy C; Freischlag, Julie A; Matthews, Jeffrey B; Newman, Rachel Williams; Chen, Xiaodong; Stefanidis, Dimitrios; Britt, L D; Buyske, Jo; Fisher, Karen; Sachdeva, Ajit K; Turner, Patricia L.
  • Stain SC; Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts.
  • Ellison EC; The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Farmer DL; The University of California Davis Health System, Sacramento, California.
  • Flynn TC; University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.
  • Freischlag JA; Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
  • Matthews JB; The University of Chicago Medicine & Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Newman RW; The American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Chen X; The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.
  • Stefanidis D; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
  • Britt LD; Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia.
  • Buyske J; American Board of Surgery, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Fisher K; Public Member, Washington, DC.
  • Sachdeva AK; The American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Turner PL; The American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois.
Ann Surg ; 2024 May 29.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38814074
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

An expert panel made recommendations to optimize surgical education and training based on the effects of contemporary challenges.

BACKGROUND:

The inaugural Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC I) proposed sweeping recommendations for surgical education and training in 2004. In light of those findings, a second BRC (BRC II) was convened to make recommendations to optimize surgical training considering the current landscape in medical education.

METHODS:

BRC II was a panel of 67 experts selected on the basis of experience and leadership in surgical education and training. It was organized into subcommittees which met virtually over the course of a year. They developed recommendations, along with the Steering Committee, based on areas of focus and then presented them to the entire BRC II. The Delphi Method was chosen to obtain consensus, defined as>80% agreement amongst the panel. Cronbach alpha was computed to assess the internal consistency of three Delphi rounds.

RESULTS:

Of 50 recommendations, 31 obtained consensus in the following aspects of surgical training (# consensus recommendation /# proposed) Workforce (1/5), Medical Student Education (3/8), Work Life Integration (4/6), Resident Education (5/7), Goals, Structure and Financing of Training (5/8), Education Support and Faculty Development (5/6), Research Training (7/9), and Educational Technology and Assessment (1/1). The internal consistency was good in Rounds 1 and 2 and acceptable in Round 3.

CONCLUSIONS:

BRC II used the Delphi approach to identify and recommend 31 priorities for surgical education in 2024. We advise establishing a multidisciplinary surgical educational group to oversee, monitor and facilitate implementation of these recommendations.

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article