Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Gastrointestinal pain: A systematic review of temporal summation of pain paradigms and outcomes.
Huisman, Danielle; Mansfield, Michael; Cummins, Tatum M; Moss-Morris, Rona; McMahon, Stephen B; Bannister, Kirsty.
  • Huisman D; Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Mansfield M; School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Cummins TM; Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
  • Moss-Morris R; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
  • McMahon SB; Neurorestoration Group, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Bannister K; Health Psychology Section, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Eur J Pain ; 2024 May 31.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38817207
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE:

Since targeted treatment for gastrointestinal pain is elusive, identifying the mechanistic underpinning of this pain type is important. Facilitation of spinal neuronal responses underpins certain pain types, and the psychophysical temporal summation of pain (TSP) paradigm provides a proxy measure of spinal facilitatory processes. Our aim was to systematically review whether facilitated TSP is a feature of gastrointestinal pain in patients with, or pain-free people experiencing experimentally induced, gastrointestinal pain. DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsychInfo, CINAHL, and Web of Science were systematically searched, from inception to July 2023, for human studies reporting TSP paradigm outcomes in the context of gastrointestinal pain. The Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional studies was used for quality assessment and applied independently by two researchers.

RESULTS:

Fifteen papers consisting of cross-sectional (n = 6), case-control (n = 8), and retrospective cohort (n = 1) studies, were included. Thirteen studies investigated TSP in people with gastrointestinal pain with (n = 5) or without (n = 8) defined pathology. Two studies evoked TSP by repetitive gut stimulation in people undergoing abdominal medical procedures. Preliminary evidence showed that facilitated TSP correlated with the presence of functional gastrointestinal pain in women, and those with a history of trauma. No effect was observed in people with inflammatory bowel disease, although it was often unclear if they experienced pain.

CONCLUSIONS:

It is not possible to conclude whether facilitated TSP is a feature of gastrointestinal pain. We recommend that subgroup findings are corroborated and that TSP paradigms are standardized in order that direct comparisons between studies may be made. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Evidence indicated that pain facilitatory processes, as evidenced by a facilitated TSP outcome, contribute to functional gastrointestinal pain in women and those with a history of trauma. However, heterogeneity of study populations and paradigms precluded statistical synthesis and findings would need be corroborated. Studies exploring facilitatory processes in people with inflammatory bowel diseases did not report significant results, but pain is not a given in these conditions and, conversely, may be driven by peripheral inflammation during active disease. This should be taken in consideration in future explorations. REGISTRATION REVIEW PROSPERO CRD42022341845.

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article