Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Simple and rapid flow cytometry assay for the detection of malignant epithelial cells in body fluids.
Ramalingam, Thulasi Raman; Mani, Sandeep; Narla, Swetha; Lakshmanan, Archana; Muthu, Anurekha; Nk, Harsha Rasheed; Mohanraj, Selvaraj; Ramachandran, Ellapan Dharma; Subramanyam, Annapurneswari; Vaidhyanathan, Lakshman.
  • Ramalingam TR; Department of Hematology, Apollo Cancer Centre, Chennai, India.
  • Mani S; Department of Histopathology, Apollo Cancer Centre, Chennai, India.
  • Narla S; Department of Histopathology, Apollo Cancer Centre, Chennai, India.
  • Lakshmanan A; Department of Histopathology, Apollo Cancer Centre, Chennai, India.
  • Muthu A; Department of Hematology, Apollo Cancer Centre, Chennai, India.
  • Nk HR; Department of Hematology, Apollo Cancer Centre, Chennai, India.
  • Mohanraj S; Department of Hematology, Apollo Cancer Centre, Chennai, India.
  • Ramachandran ED; Department of Hematology, Apollo Cancer Centre, Chennai, India.
  • Subramanyam A; Department of Histopathology, Apollo Cancer Centre, Chennai, India.
  • Vaidhyanathan L; Department of Histopathology, Apollo Cancer Centre, Chennai, India.
Cytopathology ; 2024 Jun 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38837279
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Morphology is routinely used for detecting malignant cells in body fluids, but it has limitations. Recently, flow cytometry (FCM) is used as an effective tool for studying non-haematological malignancies. The main objective of this study is to standardize a simple and rapid FCM test for the detection of malignant epithelial cells in body fluids. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Body fluids that had been processed for cytology/cytology and FCM were enrolled in this prospective study. We developed a fluorescent-labelled, monoclonal antibody panel composed of cell surface markers for this FCM assay. We compared the results of cytology/cell block and FCM.

RESULTS:

A total of 121 fluid samples were studied. Comparing the diagnostic performance of cytology/cell block and FCM, 52 (43%) cases were positive and 60 (49.5%) cases were negative for carcinoma cells by both techniques. Nine cases showed discordant results between the two techniques. Six cases were cytology+ but FCM- and three cases were FCM+ cytology-. Clustered Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule (EpCAM)-positive events with high scatter properties were definitive for positive diagnosis by FCM. We studied PD-L1 expression in 13 cases by FCM. Six cases were reported as false negative by this FCM assay due to hypocellularity and lack of EpCAM expression in malignant cells.

CONCLUSIONS:

This FCM assay is simple, easier and cost-effective yielding sensitive results with no inter-observer variability. FCM would become a valuable tool to complement routine diagnostic cytology and reduces misdiagnosis.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article