Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of a prospective feedback loop aimed at reducing non-beneficial treatments in older people admitted to hospital and potentially nearing the end of life. A cluster stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial.
White, Nicole M; Barnett, Adrian G; Lee, Xing J; Farrington, Alison; Carter, Hannah; McPhail, Steven M; Cardona, Magnolia; Hillman, Kenneth; Callaway, Leonie; Willmott, Lindy; White, Ben P; Harvey, Gillian; Graves, Nicholas; Brown, Christine.
  • White NM; Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
  • Barnett AG; Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
  • Lee XJ; Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
  • Farrington A; Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
  • Carter H; Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
  • McPhail SM; Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
  • Cardona M; Digital Health and Informatics Directorate, Metro South Health, Woolloongabba, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Hillman K; Bond University Evidence Based Practice Professorial Unit, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
  • Callaway L; School of Population Health, The University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Willmott L; Simpson Centre for Health Services Research, South West Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.
  • White BP; School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Harvey G; Ingham Institute for Applied Medial Research, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Graves N; Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
  • Brown C; Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
Age Ageing ; 53(6)2024 06 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38851216
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To investigate if a prospective feedback loop that flags older patients at risk of death can reduce non-beneficial treatment at end of life.

DESIGN:

Prospective stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial with usual care and intervention phases.

SETTING:

Three large tertiary public hospitals in south-east Queensland, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS:

14 clinical teams were recruited across the three hospitals. Teams were recruited based on a consistent history of admitting patients aged 75+ years, and needed a nominated lead specialist consultant. Under the care of these teams, there were 4,268 patients (median age 84 years) who were potentially near the end of life and flagged at risk of non-beneficial treatment. INTERVENTION The intervention notified clinicians of patients under their care determined as at-risk of non-beneficial treatment. There were two notification flags a real-time notification and an email sent to clinicians about the at-risk patients at the end of each screening day. The nudge intervention ran for 16-35 weeks across the three hospitals. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with one or more intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. The secondary outcomes examined times from patients being flagged at-risk.

RESULTS:

There was no improvement in the primary outcome of reduced ICU admissions (mean probability difference [intervention minus usual care] = -0.01, 95% confidence interval -0.08 to 0.01). There were no differences for the times to death, discharge, or medical emergency call. There was a reduction in the probability of re-admission to hospital during the intervention phase (mean probability difference -0.08, 95% confidence interval -0.13 to -0.03).

CONCLUSIONS:

This nudge intervention was not sufficient to reduce the trial's non-beneficial treatment outcomes in older hospital patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ACTRN12619000675123 (registered 6 May 2019).
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cuidado Terminal Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male País como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cuidado Terminal Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male País como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article