Comparison of ERIC carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae test, BD Phoenix CPO detect panel, and NG-test CARBA 5 for the detection of main carbapenemase types of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the performance of three commercial panels, the ERIC Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Test (ERIC CRE test), the NG-Test CARBA 5 (NG CARBA 5), and the BD Phoenix CPO Detect Panel (CPO panel), for the detection of main types of carbapenemases among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE). METHODS: We collected 502 isolates of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) demonstrating intermediate or resistant profiles to at least one carbapenem antibiotic (ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem, or doripenem). Carbapenemase genes and their specific types were identified through multiplex PCR and sequencing methods. Subsequently, the ERIC CRE test, CPO panel, and NG CARBA 5 assay were conducted on these isolates, and the results were compared with those obtained from multiplex PCR. RESULTS: The results indicated that the ERIC CRE test exhibited an overall sensitivity and specificity of 98.1% and 93.6%, respectively, which were comparable to 99.1% and 90.6% for the NG CARBA 5. However, the CPO panel demonstrated a sensitivity of only 56.2% in identifying Ambler classes, exhibiting the poorest sensitivity for class A. Moreover, while the ERIC CRE test outperformed the NG CARBA 5 in identifying multi-gene isolates with multiple carbapenemase-encoding genes, the CPO panel failed to accurately classify these isolates. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the utilization of the ERIC CRE test as one of the methods for detecting carbapenemases in clinical laboratories. Nonetheless, further optimization is imperative for the CPO panel to enhance its accuracy in determining carbapenemase classification and address limitations in detecting multi-gene isolates.