Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
BrainLossNet: a fast, accurate and robust method to estimate brain volume loss from longitudinal MRI.
Opfer, Roland; Krüger, Julia; Buddenkotte, Thomas; Spies, Lothar; Behrendt, Finn; Schippling, Sven; Buchert, Ralph.
  • Opfer R; Jung Diagnostics GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Krüger J; Jung Diagnostics GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Buddenkotte T; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Spies L; Jung Diagnostics GmbH, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Behrendt F; Institute of Medical Technology and Intelligent Systems, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Schippling S; Multimodal Imaging in Neuroimmunological Diseases (MINDS), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Buchert R; Neuroscience and Rare Diseases (NRD), Roche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Basel, Switzerland.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38879844
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

MRI-derived brain volume loss (BVL) is widely used as neurodegeneration marker. SIENA is state-of-the-art for BVL measurement, but limited by long computation time. Here we propose "BrainLossNet", a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based method for BVL-estimation.

METHODS:

BrainLossNet uses CNN-based non-linear registration of baseline(BL)/follow-up(FU) 3D-T1w-MRI pairs. BVL is computed by non-linear registration of brain parenchyma masks segmented in the BL/FU scans. The BVL estimate is corrected for image distortions using the apparent volume change of the total intracranial volume. BrainLossNet was trained on 1525 BL/FU pairs from 83 scanners. Agreement between BrainLossNet and SIENA was assessed in 225 BL/FU pairs from 94 MS patients acquired with a single scanner and 268 BL/FU pairs from 52 scanners acquired for various indications. Robustness to short-term variability of 3D-T1w-MRI was compared in 354 BL/FU pairs from a single healthy men acquired in the same session without repositioning with 116 scanners (Frequently-Traveling-Human-Phantom dataset, FTHP).

RESULTS:

Processing time of BrainLossNet was 2-3 min. The median [interquartile range] of the SIENA-BrainLossNet BVL difference was 0.10% [- 0.18%, 0.35%] in the MS dataset, 0.08% [- 0.14%, 0.28%] in the various indications dataset. The distribution of apparent BVL in the FTHP dataset was narrower with BrainLossNet (p = 0.036; 95th percentile 0.20% vs 0.32%).

CONCLUSION:

BrainLossNet on average provides the same BVL estimates as SIENA, but it is significantly more robust, probably due to its built-in distortion correction. Processing time of 2-3 min makes BrainLossNet suitable for clinical routine. This can pave the way for widespread clinical use of BVL estimation from intra-scanner BL/FU pairs.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article