Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Open-Y technique for the internal mammary vein in the free abdominal flap of unilateral breast reconstruction.
Tokumoto, Hideki; Akita, Shinsuke; Yamamoto, Erina; Nakamura, Rikiya; Hayama, Shouko; Kosaka, Kentaro; Kubota, Yoshitaka; Mitsukawa, Nobuyuki.
  • Tokumoto H; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center Hospital, Japan. Electronic address: htokumoto@chiba-cc.jp.
  • Akita S; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Chiba University, Faculty of Medicine, Japan.
  • Yamamoto E; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center Hospital, Japan.
  • Nakamura R; Department of Breast Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center Hospital, Japan.
  • Hayama S; Department of Breast Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center Hospital, Japan.
  • Kosaka K; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Chiba University, Faculty of Medicine, Japan.
  • Kubota Y; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Chiba University, Faculty of Medicine, Japan.
  • Mitsukawa N; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Chiba University, Faculty of Medicine, Japan.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 95: 97-103, 2024 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38879941
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In microvascular breast reconstruction, the internal mammary vein (IMV) has emerged as the most common recipient vein. The open-Y technique can increase the vessel diameter via the bifurcation site. This study aimed to investigate the open-Y technique for IMV.

METHODS:

The characteristics and details of the operative procedure in patients who had undergone unilateral breast reconstruction with and without the open-Y approach for the free abdominal flap were compared. Differences in IMV anastomosis site (the bifurcation of the main duct or that of the perforator branch) were also compared in patients with the open-Y technique. The open-Y technique was performed on the IMV side.

RESULTS:

The open-Y and conventional groups included 127 and 62 patients, respectively. The main duct diameter of IMV was significantly smaller (median 2.5 vs. 3.0 mm, P < 0.001), and the rate of right-sided anastomosis (47.2 vs. 82.3%, P < 0.001) was significantly lower in the open-Y group. When comparing the main duct and perforator groups, the branch diameter (1.8 vs. 1.0 mm, P < 0.001) and the diameter after the open-Y technique (5.0 vs. 3.9 mm, P < 0.001) were significantly higher, and the angle of bifurcation (45° vs. 60°, P = 0.007) was significantly lower in the main duct group.

CONCLUSIONS:

Given a small venous diameter, the open-Y technique is superior, especially for left-sided breast reconstruction. Owing to the lower angle of bifurcation and large diameter, the open-Y technique at the main duct bifurcation of IMV causes less turbulence in the blood flow. TAKE HOME MESSAGE The open-Y technique is especially effective for left-sided breast reconstruction. Considering the lower angle of bifurcation and large diameter, the open-Y technique at the main duct bifurcation of the internal mammary vein causes less turbulence in the blood flow.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Venas / Anastomosis Quirúrgica / Mamoplastia / Colgajos Tisulares Libres Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Venas / Anastomosis Quirúrgica / Mamoplastia / Colgajos Tisulares Libres Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article