Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mandibular bone imaging assessment in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Vogel, Jéssica de Oliveira; Freire, Clara Herrera; Munhoz, Luciana; Andrade, Bruno Augusto Benevenuto de; Tenório, Jefferson R.
  • Vogel JO; Department of Pathology and Oral Diagnosis - School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
  • Freire CH; Department of Pathology and Oral Diagnosis - School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
  • Munhoz L; Department of Stomatology, Public Healthy and Forensic Dentistry - Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry - University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
  • Andrade BAB; Department of Pathology and Oral Diagnosis - School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
  • Tenório JR; Department of Pathology and Oral Diagnosis - School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. Electronic address: jeffersonrtenorio@gmail.com.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38918134
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to assess the published research on mandibular cortical and trabecular bone patterns (TBPs) in individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) assessed by radiomorphometric index (RMI) analysis on dental radiographs. STUDY

DESIGN:

The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Observational studies that radiographically evaluated cortical and TBPs were analyzed. Risk of bias was assessed according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklists. Quality of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Meta-analysis was performed for studies using dichotomous models or verifying mean differences according to RMI type.

RESULTS:

Thirteen papers were included. Mandibular cortical index (MCI) and mental index (MI) were the most frequently evaluated RMIs. For MCI, the estimated risk ratio for decreased bone mineral density indicated by greater porosity in the cortices was 13.7% in CKD patients (95% confidence interval 0.04-0.24; P = .008) when compared to healthy individuals. MI mean differences in CKD compared to control groups ranged from -0.5100 to -0.2000 mm. However, risk of bias was generally high and quality of evidence was very low.

CONCLUSIONS:

MCI and MI are useful screening tests in assessing bone patterns but must be evaluated with caution due to the risk of bias and low quality of evidence in the published literature.

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article