Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multi-location evaluation of field pea in Indian climates: eco-phenological dynamics, crop-environment relationships, and identification of mega-environments.
Parihar, Ashok K; Hazra, Kali Krishna; Lamichaney, Amrit; Gupta, Debjyoti Sen; Kumar, Jitendra; Mishra, R K; Singh, Anil K; Bhartiya, Anuradha; Sofi, Parvaze Ahmad; Lone, Ajaz A; Das, Sankar P; Yadav, Rajesh Kumar; Punia, S S; Singh, A K; Rai, Geeta; Mahto, C S; Singh, Khajan; Tiwari, Smita; Saxena, Ashok K; Nair, Sunil Kumar; Parikh, Mangla; Sharma, Vijay; Mishra, Sudhakar P; Singh, Deepak; Gupta, Sanjeev; Dixit, G P.
  • Parihar AK; ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208024, India. ashoka.parihar@gmail.com.
  • Hazra KK; ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208024, India. kalikrishna123@gmail.com.
  • Lamichaney A; ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208024, India.
  • Gupta DS; ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208024, India.
  • Kumar J; ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208024, India.
  • Mishra RK; ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208024, India.
  • Singh AK; ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208024, India.
  • Bhartiya A; Vivekanand Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sansthan (ICAR), Almora, Uttarakhand, 263601, India.
  • Sofi PA; Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, 190025, India.
  • Lone AA; Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir, 190025, India.
  • Das SP; ICAR-Research Complex for North Eastern Hill Region, Agartala, 799010, India.
  • Yadav RK; Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, 125004, India.
  • Punia SS; Rajasthan Agricultural Research Institute, Jaipur, 302018, India.
  • Singh AK; Institute of Agricultural Science, BHU, Varanasi, 221005, India.
  • Rai G; Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur, 208002, India.
  • Mahto CS; Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi, 834006, India.
  • Singh K; Agriculture University, Kota, Rajasthan, 324001, India.
  • Tiwari S; Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Sagar, 470002, India.
  • Saxena AK; College of Agriculture, Rafi Ahmad Kidwai (RAK), Sehore, Madhya Pradesh, 466001, India.
  • Nair SK; Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur, 492012, India.
  • Parikh M; Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur, 492012, India.
  • Sharma V; Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda, 210001, India.
  • Mishra SP; Mahatma Gandhi Chitrakoot Gramodaya Vishwavidyalaya, Chitrakoot, 485334, India.
  • Singh D; ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
  • Gupta S; Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi, 110001, India.
  • Dixit GP; ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208024, India.
Int J Biometeorol ; 2024 Jun 26.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38922422
ABSTRACT
Characterization of crop-growing environments in relation to crop's genotypic performance is crucial to harness positive genotype-by-environment interactions (GEI) in systematic breeding programs. Given that, the study aimed to delineate the impact of diverse environments on crop phenology and yield traits of dwarf-statured field pea, pinpointing location(s) favoring higher yield and distinctiveness within breeding lines. We tested twelve field pea breeding lines across twenty locations in India, covering Central Zone (CZ), North Western Plain Zone (NWPZ), North Eastern Plain Zone (NEPZ), and Northern Hill Zone (NHZ). Across these locations, maximum and minimum temperatures during flowering (TMAXF, TMINF) and reproductive period (TMAXRP, TMINRP) ranged 18.9-28.3, 3.3-18.0, 15.0-30.8, and 7.9-22.1oC, respectively. Meanwhile, notable variations in phenological and agronomic traits (coefficient of variation) were observed flowering (31%), days to maturity (21%), reproductive period (18%), grain yield (48%), and 100-seed weight (18%). Combined ANOVA demonstrated an oversized impact of environment (81%) on yield, while genotype and GEI effects were 2% and 14%, respectively. The variables TMINF, TMINRP, and cumulative growing degree-day showed positive correlations with yield, while extended vegetative and maturity durations negatively influenced yield (p < 0.05). Additionally, linear mixed-models and PCA results explained that instability in crop phenology had significant influence on field pea yield. Seed weight was markedly varied within the locations (9.9-20.8 g) and both higher and lower seed weights were associated with lower yields (Optimal = 17.1 g). HA-GGE biplot-based on environment focus-scaling demonstrated three mega-environments and specific locations viz. Kota (CZ), SK Nagar (CZ), Raipur (CZ), Sehore (CZ), and Pantnagar (NWPZ) as the ideal testing-environments with high efficiency in selecting new genotypes with wider adaptability. The study findings highlight distinct impact of environments on crop phenology and agronomic traits of field pea (dwarf-type), hold substantial value in designing efficient field pea (dwarf-type) breeding program at mega-environment scale.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article