Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The impact of ethical implications intertwined with tuberculosis household contact investigation: a qualitative study.
Mlambo, L M; Milovanovic, M; Hanrahan, C F; Motsomi, K W; Morolo, M T; Mohlamonyane, M P; Albaugh, N W; Ahmed, K; Martinson, N A; Dowdy, D W; West, N S.
  • Mlambo LM; Perinatal HIV Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Soweto, South Africa.
  • Milovanovic M; Perinatal HIV Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Soweto, South Africa.
  • Hanrahan CF; African Potential Group, Johannesburg, South Africa.
  • Motsomi KW; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Morolo MT; Perinatal HIV Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Soweto, South Africa.
  • Mohlamonyane MP; Setshaba Research Centre, Soshanguve, South Africa.
  • Albaugh NW; Perinatal HIV Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Soweto, South Africa.
  • Ahmed K; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
  • Martinson NA; Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
  • Dowdy DW; Setshaba Research Centre, Soshanguve, South Africa.
  • West NS; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America.
medRxiv ; 2024 Jun 28.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38978659
ABSTRACT

Background:

Household contact investigation (HCI) is an effective and widely used approach to identify persons with tuberculosis (TB) disease and infection, globally. Despite widespread recommendations for the use of HCI, there remains poor understanding of the impact on and value of contact investigation for participants. Further, how HCI as a practice impacts psychosocial factors, including stigma and possible unintended disclosure of illness among persons with TB, their families, and communities, is largely unknown.

Methods:

This exploratory qualitative study nested within a randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04520113, 17 August 2020) was conducted in South Africa to understand the impacts of HCI on index patients living with TB and their household contact persons in two rural districts in the Limpopo province (Vhembe and Capricorn) and Soshanguve, a peri-urban township in Gauteng province. People with TB and household members of people with TB were recruited to participate in in-depth interviews and focus group discussions using semi-structured guides. We explored individual, interpersonal, and community-level perceptions of potential impacts of household contact investigation to elucidate their perceptions of HCI. Thematic analysis identified key themes.

Results:

Twenty-four individual interviews and six focus group discussions (n=39 participants) were conducted. Participants viewed HCI as an effective approach to finding TB cases, helpful in educating households about TB symptoms and reducing barriers to health-related services. At the interpersonal level, HCI aided people with TB in safely disclosing their TB status to family members and facilitated family and social support for accountability. The introduction of HIV testing during HCI was reported by some participants as making household members slightly uncomfortable, decreasing interest in household members being tested for TB. HCI negatively impacted community-level TB and HIV-related stigma due to healthcare worker visibility at home.

Conclusion:

Our data suggests varying impacts of HCI on people with TB, their families and interpersonal relationships, and communities, highlighting the importance of considering approaches that address concerns about community stigma and HIV testing to enhance acceptance of HCI.
Palabras clave