Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient-centric comparative analysis of experiences in open upright and conventional closed MRI scanners.
Behluli, E; Preuer, H M; Schiefermeier-Mach, N; Hornung, R; Küchler, M; Prokopetz, M.
  • Behluli E; Department of Radiological Technologies, Health University of Applied Sciences Tyrol/ Fhg - Zentrum für Gesundheitsberufe Tirol, Innsbruck, Austria; Radiological Institute Zurich-Altstetten, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Preuer HM; Department of Radiological Technologies, Health University of Applied Sciences Tyrol/ Fhg - Zentrum für Gesundheitsberufe Tirol, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Schiefermeier-Mach N; Unit for Research and Innovation, Health University of Applied Sciences Tyrol/ Fhg - Zentrum für Gesundheitsberufe Tirol, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Hornung R; Radiological Institute Zurich-Altstetten, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Küchler M; Radiological Institute Zurich-Altstetten, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Prokopetz M; Department of Radiological Technologies, Health University of Applied Sciences Tyrol/ Fhg - Zentrum für Gesundheitsberufe Tirol, Innsbruck, Austria. Electronic address: martina.prokopetz@fhg-tirol.ac.at.
Radiography (Lond) ; 30(5): 1258-1264, 2024 Jul 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38991328
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

MRI often induces anxiety, leading to incomplete scans and claustrophobia-related distress. Open MRI systems aim to enhance patient comfort. This study examines how prior MRI experiences impact subsequent encounters in an open upright MRI scanner.

METHODS:

In this cross-sectional study, 118 adult patients completed a self-administered questionnaire from August 2022 to October 2023. It covered previous MRI experiences, including questions about claustrophobia, premature scan terminations, sedative medication usage, general MRI experiences, and interactions with radiology technologists.

RESULTS:

Patients in open upright MRI reported less claustrophobia compared to closed MRI systems (18.4% vs. 58.3%), fewer premature scan terminations (5.3% vs. 31.0%), and less sedative use (5.3% vs. 46.9%). Moderate positive correlations were found between past and current claustrophobic events and premature scan terminations. Effective communication with radiology technologists was essential for patient comfort and reduced claustrophobia. Scan duration and noise triggered discomfort in 26.1% and 21.6% of study participants respectively. Persons without prior MRI experience were more satisfied with the examination and expressed no clear preference for future MRI settings, contrasting those with previous exposure favoring the open MRI setup.

CONCLUSION:

The study emphasizes the benefits of open upright MRI for high-risk claustrophobic patients. It identifies the lasting impact of negative MRI experience on future examinations and highlights the crucial role of radiology technologists. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Integrating open MRI scanners in medical facilities and prioritizing effective communication with radiology technologists enhances patient comfort. Positive experiences with open MRI may improve patient compliance and offer greater flexibility for future examinations.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article