Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of the German version of the Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ).
Kanniess, Frank; Defosse, Kerstin; Lommatzsch, Marek; Schultz, Thomas; Timmermann, Hartmut; Schmidt, Olaf; Heindl, Stefan; Baumann, Hans Jörg; Buhl, Roland; Taube, Christian; Höing, Fabian; Korn, Stephanie.
  • Kanniess F; Gemeinschaftspraxis Reinfeld, Reinfeld, Germany.
  • Defosse K; Respiratory and Immunology, AstraZeneca Germany, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Lommatzsch M; Pneumology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
  • Schultz T; MECS Research GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
  • Timmermann H; Pneumologicum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Schmidt O; Pneumologische Gemeinschaftspraxis, Koblenz, Germany.
  • Heindl S; Pneumologische Praxis Gauting, Gauting, Germany.
  • Baumann HJ; Pneumologische Praxis Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
  • Buhl R; Klinik für Pneumologie, Zentrum für Thoraxerkrankungen, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Taube C; Ruhrlandklinik - Klinik für Pneumologie, Universitätsmedizin Essen, Essen, Germany.
  • Höing F; Respiratory and Immunology, AstraZeneca Germany, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Korn S; Pneumologie, IKF, Mainz, Germany.
Pneumologie ; 2024 Jul 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38991526
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The Asthma Impairment and Risk Questionnaire (AIRQ), a 10-item, equally weighted, yes/no tool assessing symptom impairment and risk of exacerbations in patients with asthma aged ≥12 years, was developed and validated in a US patient population to evaluate varying levels of asthma control. This study aimed to validate the German language version of the AIRQ in patients aged ≥12 years with different levels of asthma control.

METHODS:

A cross-sectional, observational, multi-centre study comprising a single visit was conducted in multiple specialised asthma centres and general practices in Germany. A total of 300 patients completed the following

measures:

1) Patient Sociodemographic and Clinical Questionnaire, 2) AIRQ, 3) Asthma Control Test (ACT), and 4) Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6). Logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the AIRQ score cut points with the greatest predictive validity in discriminating between different control levels relative to a standard of ACT plus prior-year exacerbations or ACQ-6 plus prior-year exacerbations.

RESULTS:

The German version of the AIRQ demonstrated a robust capability to correctly identify well-controlled versus not well- or very poorly controlled (AUC values of 0.90 or higher) and well- or not well-controlled versus very poorly controlled asthma (AUC values of 0.89 or higher).

CONCLUSIONS:

The German version of the AIRQ is a suitable tool to identify adults with varying levels of asthma control, which in turn can help to accurately identify patients with uncontrolled asthma in clinical practice.

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article