Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Endoscopic Balloon Dilatation of Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis Strictures in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Dahiya, Dushyant Singh; Jena, Anuraag; Bapaye, Jay; Mohan, Babu P; Kassab, Lena L; Facciorusso, Antonio; Chandan, Saurabh; Kochhar, Gursimran S.
  • Dahiya DS; Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Motility, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA.
  • Jena A; Department of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
  • Bapaye J; Department of Gastroenterology, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA, USA.
  • Mohan BP; Orlando Gastroenterology PA, Orlando, FL, USA.
  • Kassab LL; Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Facciorusso A; Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Biomedical Science, Foggia University Hospital, Foggia, Puglia, Italy.
  • Chandan S; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.
  • Kochhar GS; Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Inflamm Bowel Dis ; 2024 Jul 16.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39011760
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the treatment of choice for medically refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assess outcomes and safety of endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) for IPAA strictures.

METHODS:

A systematic search of numerous databases was performed through June 2023 to identify studies reporting on the outcomes of EBD in pouch-related strictures. Outcomes included technical success, clinical success at index dilation and in pouch retention, recurrence of symptoms post-EBD, and adverse events of EBD. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model, and results were expressed in terms of pooled rates along with relevant 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran Q statistical test with I2 statistics.

RESULTS:

Seven studies with 504 patients were included. The pooled rate of technical success and clinical success of index dilatation was 98.9% (95% CI, 94.8-99.8%; I20%) and 30.2% (95% CI, 7.1-71%; I20%), respectively. The pooled rate of clinical success in pouch retention without the need for additional surgery was 81.4% (95% CI, 69.6-89.3%; I272%). The pooled failure rate of EBD was 18.6% (95% CI, 10.7-30.4%, I272%). The pooled rate of recurrence of symptoms after index dilatation was 58.9% (95% CI, 33.3-80.5%; I213%). The pooled rate of serious adverse events was 1.8% (95% CI, 1-3.5%, I20%). No deaths related to EBD were reported.

CONCLUSIONS:

Endoscopic balloon dilatation is safe and highly effective for management of IPAA strictures. Additional studies are needed to compare its efficacy with surgical interventions.
In this meta-analysis of 7 studies consisting of 504 inflammatory bowel disease patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis strictures, endoscopic balloon dilation was highly safe and effective with excellent clinical and technical success rates.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article