Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Antigliadin antibodies and the brain in people without celiac disease: a case-control study.
Croall, Iain D; Armitage, Paul A; Hadjivassiliou, Marios; Sanders, David S; HoggardMD, Nigel.
  • Croall ID; School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield.
  • Armitage PA; School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield.
  • Hadjivassiliou M; Department of Neurology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.
  • Sanders DS; Academic Unit of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.
  • HoggardMD N; School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 2024 Jul 25.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39052776
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Anti-gliadin antibodies (AGA) occur in approximately 10% of the general population, produced as a response to gluten. Autoimmune gluten-related disorders can have detrimental neurological effects if not properly controlled but the relevance of such "incidental" AGA is not properly established; any harm caused would indicate the gluten-free diet as a means for affected people to protect their brain health. We explored this question by comparing brain MRI scanning, cognitive testing and other measures between healthy volunteers with and without AGA.

METHODS:

Healthy volunteers aged 50-70 (without celiac disease, on a gluten-containing diet) underwent blood testing to confirm AGA status. Any AGA+ subjects were matched to AGA- controls on age, sex, BMI, level of education, hypertension diagnosis and smoking history. These subgroups underwent a cognitive test battery, quality-of-life (QoL) surveys and brain MRI scanning. Groups were compared between all outcome measures. Secondary analyses correlated AGA titre with outcomes across the whole cohort.

RESULTS:

Groupwise comparisons of cognitive, QoL and MRI studies were all negative. Repeating these analyses as correlations with AGA titre across the cohort, a single significant result was found concerning the error rate on the subtle cognitive impairment test, in a direction indicating increased IgG AGA to predict worse performance. This did not survive multiple comparisons correction.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our analysis is the most comprehensive to date and utilises a number of outcome measures known to be sensitive to subtle shifts in neurophysiology and cognition. Incidental AGA does not appear to be associated with any indications of neuropsychological deficit.

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article